Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison between injection/non-injection groups by univariate analysis

From: Preoperative hyaluronic acid injection modulates postoperative functional outcome in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Functional outcome

Univariate analysis

Variables

Injection group

Non-injection group

p value

Age (years)

64.4

62.1

0.22

Sex (n)

 Male

32 (55%)

28 (70%)

 

 Female

26 (44%)

12 (30%)

0.13

NSAID (n)

37 (63%)

24 (60%)

0.70

Hard work (n)

21 (38%)

13 (35%)

0.71

Diabetes mellitus (n)

2 (3%)

5 (12%)

0.08a

Contracture (n)

15 (25%)

7 (17%)

0.32

Trauma (n)

27 (56%)

13 (37%)

0.08a

Workmen’s accidents (n)

8 (15%)

5 (14%)

0.88

Worker’s compensation (n)

8 (15%)

5 (14%)

0.88

Follow-up period (months)

8.4

8.9

0.81

Preoperative

VAS (rest)

2.1

2.1

0.97

VAS (motion)

5.6

4.7

0.14

VAS (night)

4.5

3.6

0.17

Preoperative ROM

 Elevation (°)

107

112

0.52

 Abduction (°)

99

106

0.44

 Internal rotation (level of intervertebral body)

5.2

5.5

0.62

 External rotation (°)

48

45

0.51

Preoperative muscle strength

 Elevation (relative ratio to uninvolved side)

70

75

0.28

 Abduction

72

74

0.77

 Internal rotation

72

85

0.58

 External rotation

90

87

0.17

 UCLA score

14

16

0.04a

Postoperative (PO) VAS

 PO 3 M VAS (rest)

0.6

0.7

0.86

 PO 3 M VAS (motion)

1.4

2.2

0.04a

 PO 3 M VAS (night)

0.8

1.4

0.06a

 PO 4 M VAS (rest)

0.4

0.7

0.19

 PO 4 M VAS (motion)

2.1

2.1

0.88

 PO 4 M VAS (night)

1.0

1.5

0.18

 PO 6 M VAS (rest)

0.3

0.6

0.11

 PO 6 M VAS (motion)

1.5

1.9

0.24

 PO 6 M VAS (night)

0.7

0.9

0.55

 PO 12 M VAS (rest)

0.3

0.4

0.61

 PO 12 M VAS (motion)

1.1

1.0

0.59

 PO 12 M VAS (night)

0.4

0.3

0.62

Postoperative ROM

 PO 3 M elevation (°)

97

89

0.32

 PO 3 M abduction (°)

83

79

0.68

 PO 3 M internal rotation (level of intervertebral body)

2.9

3.1

0.71

 PO 3 M external rotation (°)

20

17

0.48

 PO 4 M elevation (°)

114

119

0.44

 PO 4 M abduction (°)

104

112

0.38

 PO 4 M internal rotation (level of intervertebral body)

4.8

4.3

0.44

 PO 4 M external rotation (°)

28

28

0.93

 PO 6 M elevation (°)

134

126

0.24

 PO 6 M abduction (°)

133

127

0.39

 PO 6 M internal rotation (level of intervertebral body)

6.6

5.5

0.08a

 PO 6 M external rotation (°)

36

34

0.57

 PO 12 M elevation (°)

140

141

0.79

 PO 12 M abduction (°)

142

143

0.88

 PO 12 M internal rotation (level of intervertebral body)

8.1

7.9

0.80

 PO 12 M external rotation (°)

38

38

0.87

Postoperative (PO) muscle strength

 PO 3 M elevation (relative ratio to uninvolved side)

33

31

0.68

 PO 3 M abduction

34

31

0.47

 PO 3 M internal rotation

71

67

0.53

 PO 3 M external rotation

58

57

0.95

 PO 4 M elevation (relative ratio to uninvolved side)

55

48

0.25

 PO 4 M abduction

61

49

0.06a

 PO 4 M internal rotation

82

80

0.70

 PO 4 M external rotation

77

74

0.82

 PO 6 M elevation (relative ratio to uninvolved side)

70

59

0.10

 PO 6 M abduction

71

64

0.39

 PO 6 M internal rotation

90

93

0.58

 PO 6 M external rotation

81

76

0.57

 PO 12 M elevation (relative ratio to uninvolved side)

82

78

0.60

 PO 12 M abduction

78

77

0.85

 PO 12 M internal rotation

100

90

0.06a

 PO 12 M external rotation

83

87

0.65

Postoperative UCLA score

 PO 3 M UCLA score

16

13

0.03a

 PO 4 M UCLA score

20

18

0.41

 PO 6 M UCLA score

24

23

0.74

 PO 12 M UCLA score

28

28

0.93

  1. Data were evaluated by logistic analysis
  2. NSAID non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ROM range of motion, VAS visual analog scale, UCLA score University of California at Los Angeles score
  3. ap value < 0.1