Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of study characteristics and demographics

From: Does zero-profile anchored cage accompanied by a higher postoperative subsidence compared with cage-plate construct? A meta-analysis

Study

Type

Time

Study period

Country

Surgical levels (ZP/CP)

Patients (ZP/CP)

Gender (male/female)

Mean age

Follow-up (months)

Design of zero-profile device

ZP

CP

ZP

CP

Nemoto [12]

RCT

2015

2010–2012

Japan

One, 24/22

46 (24/22)

21/3

21/1

40.9 ± 7.2

41.6 ± 7.0

24

PREVAIL

Shin [24]

Retro

2014

2008–2013

Korea

One, 20/20

40 (20/20)

7/13

13/7

50.0 ± 12.0

44.3 ± 9.7

13.5

Zero-P

Lee [2]

Retro

2015

2005–2011, 2012–2013

Korea

One, 23/18

41 (23/18)

11/12

11/7

57.26 ± 13.28

52.89 ± 7.71

19.9

Zero-P

Shi [9]

Retro

2015

2010–2011

China

Three, 18/20

38 (18/20)

11/7

12/8

56.2 ± 64.8

56.7 ± 63.9

30.3

Zero-P

Chen [11]

Retro

2016

2010–2012

China

Three, 18/20

71 (33/38)

18/15

21/17

49.3 ± 3.7

48.8 ± 3.9

30.8

Zero-P

Li [13]

Retro

2017

2009–2013

China

One, 32/34; two, 21/23; three, 11/10; four, 4/3

138 (68/70)

41/27

45/25

50.6 ± 7.5

51.3 ± 7.9

24

Fidji

Yun [25]

Retro

2017

2006–2015

Korea

Two, 31/32

63 (31/32)

22/9

29/3

53.29 ± 7.55

54.18 ± 9.87

13.2

Zero-P

Zhou [10]

Retro

2018

2010–2013

China

One, 20/21; two, 18/14; three, 13/12

98 (51/47)

23/28

22/25

62.3 ± 6.7

64.4 ± 3.2

36

ROI-C

Lu [23]

Retro

2018

2011–2015

China

Two, 22/24

46 (22/24)

13/9

15/9

56.6 ± 6.4

58.6 ± 7.2

24

ROI-C

Zhu [26]

Retro

2019

2013–2014

China

Three, 30/32

62 (30/32)

12/18

18/14

56.6 ± 12.6

55.3 ± 11.3

36

MC+

  1. ZP zero-profile group, CP cage-plate group, RCT randomized controlled study, Retro retrospective study