Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis

From: Is hip fracture surgery safe for patients on antiplatelet drugs and is it necessary to delay surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Country

Study type

Quality assessment

Duration

Sample size

Groups

Female (%)

Age (year)a

Time to surgery (day)a

Fracture type

Concurrent antiplatelet or thromboprophylaxis

Al Khudairy et al. [25]

Ireland

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * ***

24 months

47

Early VS delayed

66%

80.3 (8.3)

4.2 (1.0) VS 8.0 (1.0)

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Chechik et al. [26]

Israel

Quasi-randomized (retrospective)

**** * ***

34 months

60

Early VS delayed

50%

82.5 (7.9)

1.67 (1.0) VS 7.5 (2.70)

Intra and extracapsular

33% in early group and 17% in delayed group on aspirin 40 mg LMWH for thromboprophylaxis

Cox et al. [27]

UK

Cohort (retrospective)

**** _ **

2 years

20

Early VS delayed

65%

80.9

1.1 VS 7

Intra and extracapsular

Chemical or mechanical thromboprophylaxis

Johansen et al. [28]

UK

Cohort (retrospective)

**** _ **

18 months

17

Early VS delayed

Unclear

Unclear

2.7 VS 7.3

Unclear

Unclear

Pailleret et al. [29]

France

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** **

6 years

39

Early VS delayed

77%

86 (7.5)

1 (1) VS 5 (1)

Intra and extracapsular

24% in early group and 32% in delayed group on aspirin 40 mg LMWH for thromboprophylaxis

Sa-Ngasoongsong et al. [30]

Thailand

Cohort (prospective and retrospective)

**** * ***

3 years

94

Early VS delayed

73%

80.5 (8.0)

1.6 (0.9) VS 8.9 (3.6)

Intra and extracapsular

42 aspirin and 7 clopidogrel in early group, 36 aspirin, and 9 clopidogrel in delayed group

Yoo et al. [31]

Korea

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * ***

3 years

43

Early VS delayed

70%

73.0 (7.1)

< 1 days VS 5.7

Intracapsular

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis was used and chemical prophylactic agents were not

Sim et al. [32]

Australia

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * ***

44 months

135

1) Early VS delayed

2) Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

76%

80.7 (9.7)

1) < 5 days VS > 5 days

2) 3.5 (3.2) VS 0.9 (0.8)

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Zehir et al. [33]

Turkey

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * ***

6 years

211

1) Early VS delayed

2) Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

55%

77.5 (7.6)

1) 1.79 VS 5.82

2) 1.79 VS 1.68

Intracapsular

40 mg LMWH for thromboprophylaxis

Anekstein et al. [34]

Israel

Cohort (prospective)

**** ** ***

14 months

104

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

Unclear

77.1 (10.1)

1.53 (0.9) VS 1.48 (0.9)

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Chechik et al. [35]

Israel

Cohort (prospective)

**** * ***

21 months

88

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

66%

81.8 (7.4)

2.15 (1.4) VS 1.88 (1.1)

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Collinge et al. [36]

USA

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** **

5 years

946

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

72%

80.8 (8.7)

1.54 (1.0) VS 1.55 (0.9)

Intra and extracapsular

A prophylactic doses of enoxaparin (Lovenox) within 24 h after surgery

Feely et al. [37]

USA

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** ***

14 years and 6 months

120

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

55%

82.2 (8.4)

1.1 (0.7) VS 1.3 (1.3)

Intra and extracapsular

2 cohorts had similar percentages of patients concurrent on aspirin and chemical thromboprophylaxis

Ghanem et al. [38]

USA

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * **

8 years

623

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

69%

83.1

1.7 VS 1.3

Intracapsular

48% with aspirin in clopidogrel group, 38% in control group. A prophylaxis of enoxaparin was 22% in clopidogrel group and 30% in control group

Ginsel et al. [39]

Australia

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * ***

1 year

300

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

71%

81.6 (13.1)

1.76 VS 1.6

Intracapsular

Unclear

Kennedy et al. [40]

Ireland

Cohort (retrospective)

**** _ **

NR

98

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

73%

81.9

All patients < 2 days

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Kragh et al. [41]

Sweden

Cohort (retrospective)

**** * **

2 years

255

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

54%

82.4 (8.8)

0.84 (0.4) VS 0.8 (0.4)

Intra and extracapsular

40 mg enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis, 47% with compression bandage in antiplatelet group and 43% in non-antiplatelet group

Thaler et al. [42]

Austria

Cohort (prospective)

**** * ***

27 months

462

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

74%

78 (11)

1.29 (1.9) VS 1.3 (2.0)

Intra and extracapsular

14% of clopidogrel group and 22% control group on aspirin. 40 mg enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis

Clareus et al. [43]

Sweden

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** ***

3 years

112

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

68%

84.7 (7.3)

1.67 (1.2) VS 0.88 (0.5)

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Hossain et al. [44]

UK

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** **

2 years

102

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

81%

83.0 (7.5)

All patients < 2 days

Intracapsular

32% of clopidogrel group and 44% control group on aspirin.

40 mg enoxaparin postoperatively for 6 weeks for thromboprophylaxis

Manaqibwala et al. [45]

USA

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** **

7 years

162

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

69%

84.1 (8.9)

2.3 (2.0) VS 1.9 (2.9)

Intracapsular

66.7% of clopidogrel group and 43.5% control group on aspirin 40 mg enoxaparin or 5000 units heparin postoperatively for thromboprophylaxis

Nydick et al. [46]

USA

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** *

5 years

50

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

Unclear

Unclear

1.81 VS 1.65

Intra and extracapsular

Unclear

Wallace et al. [47]

USA

Cohort (retrospective)

**** ** ***

Over 5 years

110

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

73%

79.9 (9.1)

All patients < 2 days

Intra and extracapsular

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis was used and chemical prophylactic agents were not

Wordsworth et al. [48]

UK

Cohort (prospective)

**** * ***

6 years

1225

Antiplatelet VS no antiplatelet

72%

82.3 (9.4)

1.23 VS 1.20

Intra and extracapsular

36.7% of clopidogrel group and 20% control group on aspirin 40 mg enoxaparin postoperatively for 2-4 weeks for thromboprophylaxis

  1. A star system is used to allow a semi-quantitative assessment of study quality by using Newcastle/Ottawa scale
  2. LMWH = low molecular weight heparin
  3. 5 or more stars for selection, _ = zero score for this domain, * = 1 point within this domain
  4. aValues are mean (standard deviation)