Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the local lumbar and lumbosacral deformity angle

From: Posterior-only vs. combined posterior-anterior approaches in treating lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective study with minimum 7-year follow-up

 

Kyphosis angle(°)

Angle correction

Correction loss (°)

Group

n

Pre

Post

FFU

Post (°)

Rate (%)

A1k

20

16.8 ± 8.5

3.8±1.5

5.1 ± 1.6

13.1 ± 7.6

74.9 ± 11.8

1.3 ± 0.6

B1k

16

17.5 ± 8.3

4.3±1.8

5.5 ± 1.8

13.2 ± 7.2

72.0 ± 11.9

1.2 ± 0.6

P value

P = 0.806

P = 0.355

P = 0.460

P = 0.957

P = 0.469

P = 0.597

 

Lordotic angle (°)

 

Pre

Post

FFU

A1l

10

9.7 ± 8.8

16.9 ± 6.0

15.9 ± 6.0

7.1 ± 4.1

47.8 ± 27.2

0.9 ± 0.4

B1l

10

10.5 ± 7.6

18.1 ± 3.4

17.3 ± 3.7

7.6±5.1

46.4 ± 32.8

0.9 ± 0.3

P value

P = 0.831

P = 0.565

P = 0.554

P = 0.818

P = 0.915

P = 0.847

 

Lumbosacral angle (°)

 

Pre

Post

FFU

A2

12

13.4 ± 6.8

19.4 ± 4.3

18.7 ± 4.4

6.0 ± 3.4

34.3 ± 21.5

0.7 ± 0.3

B2

14

13.7 ± 6.2

20.0 ± 3.4

19.3 ± 3.2

6.3 ± 3.2

34.1 ± 20.9

0.8 ± 0.3

P value

P = 0.884

P= 0.676

P = 0.703

P = 0.832

P = 0.985

P = 0.611

  1. Pre preoperative, post postoperative immediately, FFU final follow-up
  2. A1k and B1k: the cases with a local lumbar kyphosis angle in lesions
  3. A1l and B1l: the cases with a local lumbar lordotic angle in lesions