Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included study

From: The short- to midterm effectiveness of stemless prostheses compared to stemmed prostheses for patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Author (years)

Country

Study design

Sample sizes

Age (years)

Gender (M/F)

Prostheses types

Follow-up (months)

Study population

Outcomes

slTSA/sTSA

slTSA/sTSA

slTSA/sTSA

slTSA/sTSA

slTSA/sTSA

Uschok et al. [15]

Germany

RCT

20/20

65/69

10/10; 7/13

Eclipse/Univers II

60/60

Primary glenohumeral OA

Glanzmann et al. [14]

Switzerland

CS

37/37

64.4 ± 13/66.7 ± 11.7

9/28; 9/28

Promos/Promos

24/24

Primary glenohumeral OA

Spranz et al. [13]

Germany

CS

12/13

74.0 ± 5.7/71.0 ± 5.4

5/6; 4/5

TESS/Aequalis

51.6/75.6

Primary glenohumeral OA

Moroder et al. [12[

Austria

CS

24/24

75.6 ± 4.6/74.3 ± 4.6

7/17; 7/17

TESS/Delta Xtend

34.2 ± 10.5/35.2 ± 14.6

Cuff-tear arthropathy

Maier et al. [11]

Germany

CS

12/12

68.3 ± 5.4/67.8 ± 7.1

7/5; 3/9

TESS/Aequalis

6/6

Primary glenohumeral OA

Mariotti et al. [10]

Italy

RCT

9/10

Aequalis/Aequalis

24/24

Primary concentric OA

Berth and Pap 2013 [3]

Germany

CS

41/41

67.22 ± 9.0/67.05 ± 8.5

14/27; 14/27

TESS/Affinis

30.8 ± 4.6/32.7 ± 4.8

Primary glenohumeral OA

Razmjou et al. [16]

Canada

PS

17/18

69.0 ± 9.0/65.0 ± 11.0

8/9; 8/10

TESS/Neer

24/24

Primary glenohumeral OA

  1. slTSA stemless total shoulder arthroplasty, sTSA stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty, M male, F female, RCT randomized controlled trial, PS prospective study, CS case-controlled study; OA osteoarthritis; pain, Constant score, active range of motions (anteversion, abduction, external rotation), strength/power, activity, motion/mobility