Skip to main content

Table 3 The imaging and clinical results among the two groups

From: Supra-ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures: reduction quality and early clinical results of a retrospective study

Ā 

Supra-ilioinguinal

Modified Stoppa

Test value

P value

CT measurement (mm)

ā€ƒMean gap

3.7 (0.5ā€“9.2, 1.7)

3.8 (0.4ā€“10.1, 2.0)

0.213

0.832#

ā€ƒMean step

0.8 (0ā€“4.3, 0.8)

1.0 (0ā€“7.3, 1.5)

0.660

0.512#

Radiological outcome (Matta)

Ā Ā 

0.052

0.974*

ā€ƒAnatomical (<ā€‰1ā€‰mm)

22 (61.1%)

14 (58.3%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒImperfect (2ā€“3ā€‰mm)

10 (27.8%)

7 (29.2%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒPoor (>ā€‰3ā€‰mm)

4 (11.1%)

3 (12.5%)

Ā Ā 

Merle Dā€™Aubigne-Postel score

Ā Ā 

0.238

0.971*

ā€ƒExcellent (18)

20 (55.6%)

12 (50.0%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒGood (15ā€“17)

12 (33.3%)

9 (37.5%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒFair (13, 14)

3 (8.3%)

2 (8.3%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒPoor (<ā€‰13)

1 (2.8%)

1 (4.2%)

Ā Ā 
  1. Data are presented as means (range, SD) in millimetres of the gaps/steps measurements (CT scan evaluation). The radiological outcome and clinical results are presented as number (percentage)
  2. *Pearson Chi-square test
  3. #Two independent samples Studentā€™s t test