Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics

From: Supra-ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures: reduction quality and early clinical results of a retrospective study

 

Supra-ilioinguinal

(nā€‰=ā€‰36)

Modified Stoppa

(nā€‰=24)

Test value

P value

Age (years)

43.4 (23ā€“71, 13.6)

44.5 (23ā€“78, 14.4)

0.314

0.754#

Male gender

26 (72.2%)

16 (66.7%)

0.212

0.645*

Mechanism of injury

  

0.100

0.752*

ā€ƒTraffic accident

18 (50.0%)

13 (54.2%)

  

ā€ƒFall from height (ā‰§ā€‰3ā€‰m)

18 (50.0%)

11 (41.9%)

  

Fracture classification

  

0.670

0.955*

ā€ƒACā€‰+ā€‰AW

4 (11.1%)

3 (12.5%)

  

ā€ƒTransverse

5 (13.9%)

3 (12.5%)

  

ā€ƒT-type

5 (13.9%)

5 (20.8%)

  

ā€ƒACPHT

9 (25.0%)

6 (25.0%)

  

ā€ƒBoth column

13 (36.1%)

7 (29.2%)

  

Multiple injuries

  

0.791

0.978*

ā€ƒPelvic fracture

7 (19.4%)

5 (20.8%)

  

ā€ƒExtremity fracture

7 (19.4%)

3 (12.5%)

  

ā€ƒSpine fracture

1 (2.8%)

1 (4.2%)

  

ā€ƒPleural effusion

11 (30.6%)

9 (37.5%)

  

ā€ƒCraniocerebral injury

2 (5.6%)

1 (4.2%)

  

Time to surgery (days)

7.1 (3ā€“20, 3.4)

7.2 (3ā€“15, 3.0)

0.097

0.923#

  1. Categorical variables are given as absolute numbers with percentages in parentheses. Noncategorical variables are given as mean (range, SD)
  2. AC anterior column, AW anterior wall, ACPHT anterior column with posterior hemitransverse
  3. *Pearson Chi-square test
  4. #Two independent samples Studentā€™s t test