Skip to main content

Table 5 Infection control rates at final follow-up

From: Linezolid versus daptomycin treatment for periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective cohort study

Pathogen and surgical intervention during this therapy

Group L, % (n)

Group D, % (n)

P value

Gram-positive bacterium

ā€ƒWhole surgical intervention

79% (22/28)

77% (23/30)

0.862a

ā€ƒImplant retention

94% (15/16)

75% (15/20)

0.147b

ā€ƒImplant removal

58% (7/12)

80% (8/10)

0.268b

Methicillin-resistant bacterium

ā€ƒWhole surgical intervention

70% (14/20)

92% (12/13)

0.136b

ā€ƒImplant retention

89% (8/9)

100% (10/10)

0.474b

ā€ƒImplant removal

55% (6/11)

67% (2/3)

0.615b

No identification using joint aspiration

ā€ƒWhole surgical intervention

100% (5/5)

100% (7/7)

Ā 

ā€ƒImplant retention

100% (5/5)

100% (3/3)

Ā 

ā€ƒImplant removal

(āˆ’)

100% (4/4)

Ā 
  1. n number
  2. aPearsonā€™s chi-squared test
  3. bFisherā€™s exact test