Skip to main content

Table 2 Biomechanical outcomes during cyclic and failure testing

From: Biomechanical comparison of subscapularis peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for double-row subscapularis repair technique in a cadaveric arthroplasty model

TestingVariableTenotomyPeelLTOP value
CyclicFirst cycle excursion (mm)3.8 ± 0.423.4 ± 0.533.2 ± 0.130.52
Elongation amplitude (mm)2.7 ± 0.352.4 ± 0.512.1 ± 0.290.06
Cyclic elongation (mm)2.9 ± 0.762.5 ± 1.22.2 ± 1.20.46
Cyclic creep (mm)6.7 ± 1.85.5 ± 1.85.3 ± 1.10.25
FailureEnergy to failure (N*mm)7057 ± 26737959 ± 32088765 ± 37850.62
Max Load (N)596.5 ± 88701 ± 156750.7 ± 2260.23
Stiffness (N/mm)46.9 ± 8.749.4 ± 8.763.6 ± 11.2a0.009
Extension at maximum load (mm)24 ± 225 ± 2.323 ± 2.10.81
  1. avs. Tenotomy and Peel