Skip to main content

Table 6 Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses of each included study

From: Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injection for knee osteoarthritis: a summary of meta-analyses

 

Kanchanatawan et al.

Dai et al.

Xu et al.

Shen et al.

PRP v HA

PRP v placebo

PRP v HA

PRP v placebo

PRP v HA

PRP v placebo

PRP v Control

Statistical heterogeneity analysis

+

+

+

+

Subgroup or sensitivity analysis

 Primary study quality

+

+

+

+

 Age

–

–

–

–

 Gender

–

–

–

–

 OA grade

–

–

–

–

 WOMAC total score

+ (≤ 1 year)

+ (≤ 1 year)

+ (6, 12 months)

+(6, 12 months)

+ (3, 6, 12 months)

+(6 months)

+(3, 6, 12 months)

 WOMAC pain score

+ (≤ 1 year)

+ (≤ 1 year)

+ (6, 12 months)

+(6, 12 months)

–

–

+(3, 6, 12 months)

 WOMAC functional score

+ (≤ 1 year)

+ (≤ 1 year)

+ (6, 12 months)

+(6, 12 months)

–

–

+(3, 6, 12 months)

 Lequesne score

+ (≤ 1 year)

–

+ (6, 12 months)

–

+ (6 months)

–

–

 IKDC score

+ (≤ 1 year)

–

+ (6, 12 months)

–

+ (6 months)

+(6 months)

–

 VAS score

+ (≤ 1 year)

–

–

–

+ (6 months)

–

–

 Adverse events

+

+

+

+

–

–

+

 No. of PRP injection (1 or ≥ 2); PRP spinning approach (single or double); mean platelet concentration (> or < 5*baseline); LP or LR PRP; with an activator or not, risk of bias

–

+

–

–