Skip to main content

Table 3 Blood loss (ml)

From: Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis

Author

MITLIF

OTLIF

Mean

SD

Nr. of Pat.

Mean

SD

Nr. of Pat.

Zhang et al. 2017 [14]

602

± 251

48

742

± 275

59

Yang et al. 2017 [15]

355.3

± 75.0

21

538.6

± 129.5

20

Tschugg et al. 2017 [16]

110.5

± 205

19

472.3

± 555

48

Kulkarni et al. 2016 [17]

111.81

–

36

358.8

–

25

Hey et al., 2015 [18]

362.5

–

25

267.5

–

25

Terman et al. 2014 [21]

100

–

53

450

–

21

Wong et al. 2014 [22]

115

–

144

485

–

54

Sulaiman et al. 2014 [13]

95

± 20

57

786

± 107

11

Singh et al. 2014 [23]

124.4

± 92.0

33

380.3

± 191.2

33

Gu et al. 2014 [24]

248.4

± 94.3

44

576.3

± 176.2

38

Brodano et al. 2013 [25]

230

–

30

620

–

34

Seng et al. 2013 [26]

127.3

± 45.7

40

405

± 80

40

Cheng et al. 2013 [27]

392.5

± 284.0

50

535.5

± 324.0

25

Lau et al. 2013 [28]

168.6

± 162.1

78

661.0

± 561.3

49

Parker et al. 2013 [30]

200

–

50

350

–

50

Adogwa et al. 2012 [31]

220

± 207.32

14

280

± 219.65

7

Wang et al. 2012 [32]

326

± 122

42

835

± 247

39

Pelton et al. 2012 [33]

125.5

± 82.425

33

271

± 84.915

33

Lee et al. 2012 [6]

50.6

± 161.0

72

976.3

± 760.8

72

Parker et al. 2012 [34]

200

–

15

295

–

15

Lau et al. 2010 [35]

466.67

–

10

565,63

–

12

Adogwa et al. 2010 [36]

200

–

15

295

–

15

Wang et al. 2010 [37]

316

± 96

25

799

± 208

27

Villavicen et al. 2010 [42]

163.0

± 131.2

76

366.8

± 298.2

63

Shunwu et al. 2009 [38]

578

± 138.8

32

711.4

± 157.3

30

Wang et al. 2010 [37]

303

± 101

42

831

± 210

43

Peng et al. 2009 [39]

150

–

29

681

–

29

Dhall et al. 2008 [40]

194

–

21

505

–

21

Schizas et al. 2008 [41]

551

–

18

1438

–

18

  1. MITLIF minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, OTLIF open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, SD standard deviation, Nr. number, Pat. patients