Diagnosis and treatment of hyperextension bicondylar tibial plateau fractures

Table 1 Demographic and peri-operative characteristic of our case series

No	Sex/age	Injury mechanism	Displacement of posterior cortex (mm)	Approach	Complication	Schatzker classification	Implant	Our classification
1	M/48	vechicle accident	3.6	Dual	MMR, LWI	VI	LCP	Hyperextention varus
2	M/36	Motor bike accident	2.4	Dual	LCL injury	VI	LCP	Hyperextention varus
3	F/34	Heavy crush	8.3	Dual	LCL injury, MMR, LMR, PAE	VI	LCP	Hyperextention varus
4	M/19	vechicle accident	19	AL	PAE	VI	LCP	Hyperextention varus
5	M/40	Falling from a car	0	MAM	–	VI	LCP	Pure hyperextention
6	M/61	Falling from height	2	MAM	DVT	VI	LCP	Pure hyperextention
7	M/39	vechicle accident	2	MAM	LMR, PAE, CPNI	VI	LCP	Hyperextention varus
8	F/61	Falling from height	0	MAM	DVT	VI	LCP	Hyperextention varus
9	F/26	vechicle accident	2	MAM	LMR	VI	LCP	Pure hyperextention
10	M/51	Motor bike accident	0	PL	–	VI	LCP	Hyperextention valgus
11	M/51	vechicle accident	2.2	Dual	–	VI	LCP	Pure hyperextention

M male, F female, MAM modified anterior midline incision, AL anterolateral incision, MMR medial meniscus rupture LWI late wound infection, LMR lateral meniscus rupture. PAE popliteal artery embolism, DVT deep vein thrombosis, CPNI common peroneal nerve injury, LCP locking compression plate

ISSN: 1749-799X