Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic data and preoperative parameters

From: Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

 

In total

Double-level TLIF group

Single-level TLIF group

P value

Number of patients

58

38

20

 

Gender, n (%)

0.415

 Male

21 (36.2%)

15 (39.5%)

6 (30.0%)

 Female

37 (63.8%)

23 (60.5%)

14 (70.0%)

Age at surgery, year

57.1 ± 6.9

54.4 ± 9.4

58.2 ± 5.7

0.104

Smokers, n (%)

10 (17.2%)

7 (18.4%)

3 (15.0%)

0.327

BMI, kg/m2

26.1 ± 4.2

26.8 ± 5.2

24.7 ± 3.6

0.112

T score of BMD

− 1.3 ± 1.1

− 1.1 ± 1.4

− 1.5 ± 0.9

0.252

The duration of symptoms, month

18.5 ± 7.6 (6–46)

19.7 ± 9.3 (10–46)

18.1 ± 6.6 (6–39)

0.497

Follow-up period, month

31.8 ± 10.7 (24–73)

34.2 ± 11.8 (24–73)

30.5 ± 9.3 (26–65)

0.229

L4–L5 level

 

 Slip percent, %

21.6 ± 10.4%

22.3 ± 13.4%

(18.1 ± 15.8)%

0.290

 Modic change, n (%)

13 (22.4%)

9 (23.6%)

4 (20.0%)

0.742

 Disc height, mm

10.9 ± 2.6

10.6 ± 2.3

11.7 ± 2.8

0.114

 Disc Pfirrmann grade

3.2 ± 1.7

3.6 ± 1.6

2.8 ± 2.1

0.110

L5–S1 level

 

 Slip percent

17.1 ± 12.3%

20.1 ± 14.6%

15.4 ± 13.8%

0.240

 Modic change incidence

16 (27.6%)

10 (26.3%)

6 (30.0%)

0.683

 Disc height, mm

9.3 ± 3.1

8.9 ± 2.8

10.2 ± 3.7

0.138

 Disc Pfirrmann grade

3.1 ± 1.8

3.2 ± 1.4

2.5 ± 2.3

0.155

  1. BMI body mass index. P value for the comparison between double-level TLIF group and single-level TLIF group