Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of the included studies

From: An enhanced recovery after surgery program in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Source

Country

Surgical site

Intervention

No. of participants

Age, mean (SD)

Male/female

Auyong et al. [29]

USA

Joint

ERAS

126

66.2 (10.2)

44/82

Traditional care

126

68.44 (9.98)

41/85

Christelis et al. [32]

Australia

Joint

ERAS

297

67 (10)

113/184

Traditional care

412

68 (11)

164/248

den Hertog et al. [33]

Germany

Joint

ERAS

74

66.58 (8.21)

23/51

Traditional care

73

68.25 (7.91)

20/53

Maempel et al. [34]

England

Joint

ERAS

84

69.8 (8.9)

42/42

Traditional care

81

70.1 (10.5)

40/44

Malviya et al. [35]

England

Joint

ERAS

1500

68

711/789

Traditional care

3000

69

1482/1518

McDonald et al. [36]

England

Joint

ERAS

1081

69 (11)

439/642

Traditional care

735

70 (13)

307/428

Stambough et al. [42]

USA

Joint

ERAS

488

55 (19)

247/241

Traditional care

281

59 (16)

126/155

Stowers et al. [37]

New Zealand

Joint

ERAS

100

66.7 (9.2)

47/53

Traditional care

100

65.4 (12.5)

41/59

Khan et al. [43]

England

Joint

ERAS

3000

68 (10)

1390/1610

Traditional care

3000

69 (10)

1482/1518

Pedersen et al. [38]

Denmark

Fracture

ERAS

178

82.2

42/136

Traditional care

357

82.6

85/272

Eriksson et al. [24]

Sweden

Fracture

ERAS

80

85

65/15

Traditional care

335

82

227/108

Liu et al. [41]

USA

Fracture

ERAS

2514

79.7 (11.7)

NA

Traditional care

2488

79.3 (11.9)

NA

Macfie et al. [39]

England

Fracture

ERAS

117

82.5 (9.2)

89/28

Traditional care

115

82.7 (8.7)

91/24

Wang et al. [8, 40]

USA

Spine

ERAS

38

65 (11)

17/21

Traditional care

15

59 (12)

10/5

Nazarenko et al. [44]

Russia

Spine

ERAS

23

44.3

NA

Traditional care

25

42.2

NA

  1. ERAS enhanced recovery after surgery, SD standard deviation