Source | Country | Surgical site | Intervention | No. of participants | Age, mean (SD) | Male/female |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Auyong et al. [29] | USA | Joint | ERAS | 126 | 66.2 (10.2) | 44/82 |
Traditional care | 126 | 68.44 (9.98) | 41/85 | |||
Christelis et al. [32] | Australia | Joint | ERAS | 297 | 67 (10) | 113/184 |
Traditional care | 412 | 68 (11) | 164/248 | |||
den Hertog et al. [33] | Germany | Joint | ERAS | 74 | 66.58 (8.21) | 23/51 |
Traditional care | 73 | 68.25 (7.91) | 20/53 | |||
Maempel et al. [34] | England | Joint | ERAS | 84 | 69.8 (8.9) | 42/42 |
Traditional care | 81 | 70.1 (10.5) | 40/44 | |||
Malviya et al. [35] | England | Joint | ERAS | 1500 | 68 | 711/789 |
Traditional care | 3000 | 69 | 1482/1518 | |||
McDonald et al. [36] | England | Joint | ERAS | 1081 | 69 (11) | 439/642 |
Traditional care | 735 | 70 (13) | 307/428 | |||
Stambough et al. [42] | USA | Joint | ERAS | 488 | 55 (19) | 247/241 |
Traditional care | 281 | 59 (16) | 126/155 | |||
Stowers et al. [37] | New Zealand | Joint | ERAS | 100 | 66.7 (9.2) | 47/53 |
Traditional care | 100 | 65.4 (12.5) | 41/59 | |||
Khan et al. [43] | England | Joint | ERAS | 3000 | 68 (10) | 1390/1610 |
Traditional care | 3000 | 69 (10) | 1482/1518 | |||
Pedersen et al. [38] | Denmark | Fracture | ERAS | 178 | 82.2 | 42/136 |
Traditional care | 357 | 82.6 | 85/272 | |||
Eriksson et al. [24] | Sweden | Fracture | ERAS | 80 | 85 | 65/15 |
Traditional care | 335 | 82 | 227/108 | |||
Liu et al. [41] | USA | Fracture | ERAS | 2514 | 79.7 (11.7) | NA |
Traditional care | 2488 | 79.3 (11.9) | NA | |||
Macfie et al. [39] | England | Fracture | ERAS | 117 | 82.5 (9.2) | 89/28 |
Traditional care | 115 | 82.7 (8.7) | 91/24 | |||
USA | Spine | ERAS | 38 | 65 (11) | 17/21 | |
Traditional care | 15 | 59 (12) | 10/5 | |||
Nazarenko et al. [44] | Russia | Spine | ERAS | 23 | 44.3 | NA |
Traditional care | 25 | 42.2 | NA |