Association between limb alignment and patient-reported outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using an implant that reproduces anatomical geometry

Table 1 Patients’ demographics, preoperative deformities, ROM, and KSS

Number of patients (male/female)	129 (24/105)
Implant type (CR/PS)	115/34
Age, years old	73.8 ± 8.1
BMI, kg/m²	26.5 ± 4.6
Follow-up period, months (range)	13.6 ± 2.6 (12–24)
FTA, degrees	185.0 ± 5.4
HKAA, degrees	13.1 ± 6.4
Extension, degrees	− 9.3 ± 11.0
Flexion, degrees	120.6 ± 17.1
ROM, degrees	111.3 ± 24.3
KSS-KS	44.5 ± 13.0
KSS-FS	36.9 ± 20.1
KSS-Combined	81.4 ± 27.6

CR cruciate-retaining, PS posterior cruciate ligament-substituting, BMI body mass index, FTA femorotibial angle, HKAA hip-knee-ankle angle, ROM range of movement. Data are expressed as a mean ± SD

ISSN: 1749-799X