Skip to main content

Table 1 Contact area results in intact and two different reconstruction groups

From: Tibiofemoral joint contact area and stress after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling techniques

 

Contact area (mm2) (mean ± SD)

Medial tibiofemoral joint

Lateral tibiofemoral joint

Intact ACL AM portal technique TT technique

Intact ACL AM portal technique TT technique

0°

515.29 ± 123.43

467.86 ± 119

461.43 ± 117.62

390.29 ± 99.75

358.71 ± 72.86

363.71 ± 79.64

10°

501.71 ± 105.26

456.29 ± 97.68

432.86 ± 101.89

378.14 ± 102.55

335.29 ± 77.98

326.71 ± 76.22

20°

454.57 ± 104.83

381 ± 79.89*

332.86 ± 76.76*■

358.14 ± 70.11

305.43 ± 72.48*

285 ± 57.51*

30°

445.71 ± 103.02

400.43 ± 92.16*

383.29 ± 100.17*

393.86 ± 79.26

353.86 ± 78.81*

362.14 ± 73.23*

  1. Tibiofemoral contact area results in intact and two different reconstruction groups (intact, TT technique, and AM portal technique). Single asterisk (*) denotes the difference between the intact state with other states and square symbol (â– ) denotes the difference between TT technique and AM portal technique