Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient, fracture and procedural characteristics in 190 patients with a proximal humeral fracture

From: Calcar screws and adequate reduction reduced the risk of fixation failure in proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate: 190 patients followed for a mean of 3 years

 

No calcar screws (n = 93)

Calcar screws (n = 97)

Mean difference or relative risk (95% CI)

p value

Age (years), mean (SD)

65 (15)

69 (13)

4.7 (0.7–8.7)

0.02 b

 median (IQR)

68 (17)

70 (20)

0.06 c

Women

64 (69)

68 (70)

1.0 (0.8–1.2)

0.8 d

Smokers

21 (23)

27 (28)

0.8 (0.5–1.3)

0.4 d

Diabetes

13 (14)

8 (8)

1.7 (0.7–3.9)

0.2 d

Non-compliance

9 (10)

7 (7)

1.3 (0.5–3.5)

0.5 d

ASA III or IV

31 (33)

23 (24)

1.4 (0.9–2.2)

0.1 d

3 or 4 part fracture type

68 (73)

74 (76)

1.0 (0.8–1.1)

0.6 d

Fracture dislocation

7 (8)

6 (6)

1.2 (0.4–3.5)

0.7 d

Preoperative varus < 105°

22 (24)

21 (22)

1.1 (0.6–1.8)

0.7 d

Preoperative valgus > 180°

16 (17)

19 (20)

0.9 (0.5–1.6)

0.7 d

Medial comminution

54 (58)

75 (77)

0.8 (0.6–0.9)

0.006 d

Surgical approach: deltoid split

69 (74)

40 (41)

1.8 (1.4–2.3)

< 0.001 d

Residual varus malalignment < 120° a

6 (7)

5 (5)

1.3 (0.4–4.0)

0.7 d

  1. Percentages in parenthesis unless stated otherwise
  2. CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range, ASA American Society of Anaesthesiologists
  3. an = 88 and 93, bIndependent two-sample t test,c Mann–Whitney test, dz statistics