Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality assessment by adjusted Jadad scale

From: Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis

Author

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants

Dropout Addressed

ITT

Tang 2009

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

Y

Verettas 2010

Adequate

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

Y

Zou 2009

Inadequate

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Y

Xu 2010

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Wang 2010

Inadequate

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

N

Peyser 2007

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Ahrengart 2002

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Xu 2010

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Butt 1995

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Unclear

Y

Leung 1992

Adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Adequate

Y

Kosygan 2002

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Peter 1995

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Kukla 1997

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Yang 2011

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Hoffman 1996

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Garg 2011

Adequate

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

N

Guo 2013

Adequate

Adequate

Unclear

Adequate

Y

Brandt 2002

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Aktselis 2014

Inadequate

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

Y

Vaquero2012

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Utrilla 2005

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Goldhagen 1994

Adequate

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Y

Christopher

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

Huang 2006

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate

Y

  1. ITT intention-to-treat analysis