Author | Country | Type of fracture | Age (year) | Intervention | Controls | Outcomes | Follow-up | Study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ducic 2016 [6] | Serbia | Gartland IIa Gartland IIb Gartland III | 6.7 vs 6.1 | Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning | Open reduction with Kirschner wire fixation (lateral approach) | 1, 2, 3, 4 | 11.2āĀ±ā2.3Ā months | RCSs |
Kaewpornsawan 2001 [11] | Thailand | NS | 7.9 vs 6.8 | Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning | Open reduction with Kirschner wire fixation (lateral approach) | 1, 2, 3, 4 | 12Ā months | RCTs |
Kazimoglu 2009 [7] | Turkey | Gartland III | 5.9 vs 6.5 | Closed reduction and percutaneous cross-pinning | Open reduction and internal fixation (lateral incision) | 1, 2, 3 | 29.5Ā months | RCSs |
Keskin 2014 [12] | Turkey | NS | Ā | closed reduction and percutaneous pinning | open reduction and percutaneous pinning(middle incision) | 1, 3, 4 | 3Ā months | RCSs |
Lu 2011 [13] | China | Gartland III | NS | closed reduction and pinning | Open reduction and pinning (middle incision) | 1, 2, 3, 4 | 10Ā months | RCTs |
Ozkoc 2004 [14] | Turkey | Gartland III | 10.7 vs 7.6 | closed reduction and pinning | Open reduction and pinning (posteromedial incision) | 1,2,3,4 | 21Ā months | RCSs |