Skip to main content

Table 1 The general characteristic of the included studies

From: Local infiltration anesthesia versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Country

Age (year, I/C)

Male patients (%, I/C)

LIA

EPA

Study

Follow-up

No. of patients

Dose and methods

No. of patients

Dose and methods

Andersen et al. 2010 [10]

Denmark

67/69

50/40

21

Combination of wound infiltration and continuous intra-articular injection postoperatively

19

Continuous epidural infusion

RCTs

30 days

Binici et al. 2014 [11]

Turkey

70.8/67.9

0/5

15

Continuous peri-articular injection postoperatively (3 ml (60 mg) lidocaine)

15

Continuous epidural infusion

RCTs

7 days

Kasture and Saraf 2015 [12]

India

67.2/67.5

12/15

40

300 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine with 5 ml ketorolac injection

35

Continuous epidural infusion (300 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine with 300 mcg fentanyl injection)

RCTs

1 month

Klasen et al. 1999 [13]

Germany

70/69

0/0

10

Single infiltration (1 mg morphine diluted in 20 ml of saline 0.9%)

10

Continuous epidural infusion (boluses of 2.5 mg of morphine)

RCTs

2 months

Spreng et al. 2010 [14]

Norway

67.2/65.8

30/41

37

Single-shot intraoperative peri-articular infiltration (ketorolac 30 mg and morphine 5 mg)

33

Continuous epidural infusion (ropivacaine 150 mg and epinephrine 0.5 mg added to isotonic saline)

RCTs

16 days

Tsukada et al. 2014 [15]

Japan

NS

NS

50

Single-shot intraoperative peri-articular infiltration

61

Continuous epidural infusion

RCTs

NS

Tsukada et al. 2015 [16]

Japan

NS

NS

37

Single-shot intraoperative peri-articular infiltration

33

Continuous epidural infusion

RCTs

6 months