The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs

Table 4 Reported accuracy with measurements for anteversion

Study	Methods	Anteversion (SD or range)	P value (t test)	Intraobserver reliability ICC	Interobserver reliability ICC
Marx et al. [14]	CT	29.9° (8.7)
	McLaren [3]	15.4° (7.7)	< 0.0001
	Ackland et al. [11]	15.6° (8.2)	< 0.0001
	Pradhan [33]	15.4° (8.4)	< 0.0001
	Widmer [9]	23.5° (10.5)	< 0.0001
	Hassan et al. [10]	15.5° (8.3)	< 0.0001
Nho et al. [15]	CT	26.80° (7.85)		0.954	0.982
	Lewinnek et al. [2]	26.90° (6.19)	0.901	0.938	0.943
	Widmer [9]	19.14° (3.32)	< 0.001	0.920	0.961
	Hassan et al. [10]	26.11° (5.26)	0.425	0.893	0.936
	Ackland et al. [11]	15.66° (3.53)	< 0.001	0.914	0.865
	Liaw et al. [8]	28.48° (6.25)	0.058	0.915	0.929
	Woo and Morrey [1]	28.08° (6.27)	0.171	0.993	0.955
Nomura et al. [29]	CT	23.8° (8.6 to 38.7)		0.971	0.975
	Lewinnek et al. [2]	19.2° (7.3 to 32.8)	< 0.001	0.930	0.946
	Widmer [9]	22.9° (10.1 to 40.4)	0.088	0.925	0.944
	Liaw et al. [8]	19.7° (7.6 to 33.9)	< 0.001	0.922	0.929
	Pradhan [33]	18.5° (6.6 to 37.0)	< 0.001	0.913	0.923
	Woo and Morrey [1]	27.7° (8.8 to 43.7)	< 0.001	0.976	0.981

ISSN: 1749-799X