Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Extramedullary versus intramedullary femoral alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Country

Patients (EM)/(IM)

Age (EM)/(IM)

Gender (EM)/(IM)

Total knee system

EM system

Jung 2013 [9]

South Korea

56/50

70.4/68.5

Female:male 6:1/5.3:1

PS prosthesis (Stryker)

Mechanical axis marker with IFD measurement

Jeon 2012 [28]

South Korea

40/40

70.1/69.2

Female

PS prosthesis (Stryker)

Markers attached to skin

Baldini 2008 [8]

Italy

50/50

71/70

Female:male 2:1/1.7:1

Posterior stabilized flex fixed-bearing prosthesis (Zimmer)

An extramedullary device with preoperative templated data

Engh 1990 [7]

USA

32/40

69.11(38-88)

Female: 53 Male: 19

Depuy

HDisc–peg taped to skin for intraoperative location

  1. EM extramedullary group, IM intramedullary group, IFD inter-femoral head distance, ASIS anterosuperior iliac spine