Skip to main content

Table 2 The table displays the means and standard deviation of the pairwise comparisons

From: Analysis of the osseointegrative force of a hyperhydrophilic and nanostructured surface refinement for TPS surfaces in a gap healing model with the Göttingen minipig

Parameters

Healing period (weeks)

CSA

TPS

p values

Osteoid ongrowth

4

1.32 % ±1.94

0.15 % ±0.26

0.0859

 

8

8.67 % ±10.26

0.46 % ±1.08

0.1051

 

12

8.10 % ±5.39

1.18 % ±1.74

0.0355

BIC

4

0.85 % ±1.83

0.01 % ±0.03

0.1953

 

8

2.47 % ±4.03

0.53 % ±1.34

0.4694

 

12

9.00 % ±8.58

0.52 % ±0.83

0.1154

Osteoid volume

4

4.98 % ±1.96

1.89 % ±0.85

0.0062

 

8

4.51 % ±2.88

1.97 % ±1.70

0.2691

 

12

3.16 % ±1.88

2.41 % ±2.25

0.5014

BA

4

7.83 % ±5.60

7.20 % ±4.51

0.7026

 

8

8.55 % ±5.21

6.61 % ±3.58

0.5530

 

12

8.78 % ±5.92

5.93 % ±4.25

0.4700

  1. Values are shown in percentages to the corresponding parameters as well as the standard deviation in percentages. P values are calculated in a two-way ANOVA using the “MIXED Procedure” of SAS