Skip to main content
Fig. 9 | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Fig. 9

From: Analysis of the osseointegrative force of a hyperhydrophilic and nanostructured surface refinement for TPS surfaces in a gap healing model with the Göttingen minipig

Fig. 9

a Osteoid volume: In the ANOVA, a p value of 0.7908 (Table 1) was calculated for the interaction implant type and postoperative time. The rhombi mark the means, and the crosses the medians of each group. The boxes display the interquartile range. At 4 weeks, you can find a significant difference in the post hoc test between CSA and TPS (* p = 0.0062) (Table 2). b Bone area: For this parameter, no significant differences could be shown, neither in the ANOVA (p = 0.8516) (Table 1) nor in the pairwise comparison (Table 2)

Back to article page