Skip to main content
Fig. 8 | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Fig. 8

From: Analysis of the osseointegrative force of a hyperhydrophilic and nanostructured surface refinement for TPS surfaces in a gap healing model with the Göttingen minipig

Fig. 8

a Osteoid ongrowth: In the ANOVA, a p value of 0.2139 (Table 1) was calculated for the interaction implant type and postoperative time. The rhombi mark the means, and the crosses the medians of each group. The boxes display the interquartile range. After 12 weeks of defect healing, you can find a significant difference (*p = 0.0355) (Table 2). b BIC: A p value of 0.2310 (Table 1) was calculated in the ANOVA. In the pairwise comparison, you can find no significant difference between CSA and TPS (Table 2). But after a healing period of 12 weeks, the amount of BIC is 17-fold increased at the CSA surface

Back to article page