Skip to main content

Table 1 The description information about included articles

From: Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of fusion segments and radiological outcomes

Study ID

Study type

Group

Number

Age, year

Gender (female/male)

Riser sign (range)

Follow-up, year

TL/L curves flexibility (%)

No. segments in lumbar curve

TL/L Cobb angle of preoperation

TL/L Cobb angle of final follow-up

Correction rate of TL/L Cobb angle of final follow-up

Hee et al. [21]

Retro

A

25

14.2 ± 1.5

25/0

0–5

≥2

NR

4.7 ± 0.7

50 ± 12

16 ± 9

NR

  

P

11

14.5 ± 1.1

11/0

1–5

≥2

NR

4.8 ± 1.0

46 ± 5

15 ± 9

NR

Wang et al. [22]

Prosp

A

16

15.38 ± 1.54

15/1

2–5

≥2

79 ± 11

5 (4, 7)

42.56 ± 7.04

9.75 ± 4.12

77 ± 11

  

P

16

14.88 ± 1.63

15/1

2–5

≥2

78 ± 17

5 (4, 7)

42.75 ± 6.12

7.56 ± 4.21

82 ± 10

Li et al. [23]

Retro

A

22

13.73 ± 1.32

NR

3 (2, 4)

≥2

47.05 ± 13.48

5 (5, 6)

50.18 ± 7.52

NR

54.42 ± 5.40

  

P

24

13.58 ± 1.50

NR

2 (2, 3)

≥2

51.07 ± 10.27

5 (5, 7)

52.12 ± 6.40

NR

55.21 ± 6.05

Geck et al. [24]

Retro

A

31

15.6 ± 2.3

NR

NR

≥2

58.5

5.2 ± 0.74

49.0 ± 6.6

15.9 ± 9

66.6

  

P

31

15.5 ± 2.0

NR

NR

≥2

50.3

5.7 ± 0.76

50.3 ± 7.0

8.0 ± 3.1

84.2

Zhan et al. [25]

Retro

A

22

14.5 ± 2.9

22/0

NR

≥1

NR

NR

56.0 ± 15.5

4.1 ± 2.0

93 ± 5

  

P

20

14.8 ± 2.2

20/0

NR

≥1

NR

NR

53.0 ± 13.4

9.4 ± 6.3

88 ± 5

Eljure et al. [26]

Retro

A

18

15 ± 1.4

18/0

NR

≥2

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

  

P

19

15 ± 1.1

19/0

NR

≥2

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Dong et al. [27]

Retro

A

17

14.8 ± 1.8

14/3

NR

4.0 ± 2.2

87.4 ± 22.7

NR

41.4 ± 5.9

10.4 ± 8.4

75.4 ± 18.5

  

P

36

14.5 ± 2.1

33/3

NR

4.0 ± 1.9

87.2 ± 27.5

NR

44.3 ± 7.4

7.5 ± 6.9

83.2 ± 16.3

  1. Retro retrospective study; Prosp prospective study; A anterior approach; P posterior approach; TL/L thoracolumbar/lumbar