Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment for non-randomized trials

From: Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Quality assessment for non-randomized trials

Hodrick et al. 2008 [3]

Minoda et al. 2009 [21]

Meneghini et al. 2015 [20]

A clearly stated aim

2

2

2

Inclusion of consecutive patients

2

2

2

Prospective data collection

1

1

2

Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study

1

1

1

Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint

1

1

1

A follow-up period appropriate to the aims of study

2

2

2

Less than 5 % loss to follow-up

0

2

0

Prospective calculation of the sample size

0

0

0

An adequate control group

2

2

2

Contemporary groups

1

1

1

Baseline equivalence of groups

2

2

2

Adequate statistical analyses

2

2

2

Total score

16

18

17