The metaphyseal bone defect in distal radius fractures and its implication on trabecular remodeling—a histomorphometric study (case series)

Table 2 Ratio of individual ultrastructural parameters between compression zone (C) and volar ROIs (V) at implant removal; sample size of the specimen and metaphyseal defect size

Initials	Ratio C vs. V BV/TV	Ratio C vs. V TbN	Ratio C vs. V TbTh	Ratio V vs. C TbSp	Ratio C vs. V OV/TV	Age	Specimens length (mm)	Defect size (mm ³ )
B G l	1.22	1.34	0.91	1.4	1.57	47	15.75	0.337
B G r	0.97	0.95	1.02	0.94	1.59	47	18.84	1.267
B E	0.37	0.64	0.58	0.56	0.58	71	12.23	0.178
B R	1.13	0.94	1.19	0.97	0.44	63	8.63	0.316
E M	0.41	0.5	0.84	0.43	0.98	65	9.02	0.299
H G	0.69	0.67	1.03	0.65	0.69	52	11.55	0.167
K S	0.37	0.27	1.38	0.24	0.92	64	12.47	1.415
K M	1.19	1.07	1.1	1.1	0.69	67	15.84	1.208
K M	0.45	0.63	0.71	0.57	1.36	68	11.81	0.187
M H	1.11	1.26	0.88	1.31	1.11	58	12.03	0.511
L J	0.92	0.91	1.01	0.89	0.86	23	11.95	0.264
N H	0.89	1.02	0.87	0.99	1.29	62	15.97	0.696
P S	0.73	0.98	0.74	0.94	1.17	21	14.04	0.38
O W	0.33	0.48	0.69	0.43	1.48	61	13.93	0.65
P E	0.94	0.86	1.09	0.84	0.48	62	15.03	0.971
R C	0.75	0.91	0.82	0.87	0.76	75	11.21	0.92

ISSN: 1749-799X