Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics of randomized studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study

Study design

Publication year

Country

Number (hands)

Gender (F/M)

Age (year)

Treatment

Study visits (week postoperative)

Efficacy variables

Complication

Agee 1992

Randomized Ten-center study

1992

US

ECTR: 65 OCTR: 82 147 hands in 122 patients

UN

UN

Agee’s one-portal procedure Regional block or general anesthesia

1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 13, 26

Grip strength, pinch strength, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensory mapping, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, Tinel’s test, manual motor testing, time return to work

ECTR: 4/65 (2 partial transection, 2 transient ulnar neurapraxia) OCTR: 4/82 (1 deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve, 1 bowstringing of the digital flexor tendons, 2 wound dehiscence)

Brown 1993

Prospective, multicenter, randomized study

1993

US

ECTR: 84 OCTR: 85 169 hands in 151

31/53 23/62

57 55

Two-portal technique

3, 6, 12

Strength, pinch strength, satisfaction, pain

ECTR: 4/84 (1 partial transection, 2 nerve injury, 1 wound hematoma) OCTR: 0/85

Sennwald and Benedetti 1995

Prospective randomized study

1995

Switzerland

ECTR: 25 OCTR: 22

19/6 18/4

48.6 57

One-portal procedure Regional anesthesia

4, 8, 12

Pain, grip, key-pinch strength, and ability to return to work Operative time

ECTR: 1/25 (1 neurapraxia) OCTR: 2/22 (1 RSD, 1 hypotrophic scar)

Dumontier 1995

Prospective randomized study

1995

France

ECTR:56 OCTR:40

49/7 36/4

53.4 50.7

Two-portal technique

2, 4, 12

Numbness, pain, return to work, pinch and grip strength

ECTR: 2/56 OCTR:2/40 (2 reflex sympathetic dystrophy for both groups)

Jacobsen 1996

Prospective randomized study

1996

Sweden

ECTR: 16 OCTR: 16 29 patients

11/5 12/4

UN

Two-portal technique

2, 6, 24

Return to work, patient satisfaction

ECTR: 3/16 (3 transient numbness) OCTR: 0/16

MacDermid 2003

Prospective randomized study

2003

Canada

ECTR: 91 OCTR: 32

62/29 22/10

45 53

Two-portal Chow’s procedure

1, 6, 12

Symptom severity, pain, pinch, grip strength, satisfaction

ECTR: 0/91 OCTR: 0/32

Ferdinand 2002

Prospective randomized blinded study

2002

Scotland

ECTR: 25 OCTR: 25

20/5 20/5

54.88

Two-portal

6, 12, 26, 52

Return to work, day off ADL score, satisfaction, operative time

ECTR: 1/25 (wound pain) OCTR: 3/25 (2 persisting pain, 1 nerve injury)

Trumble 2002

Prospective multicenter randomized study

2002

US

ECTR: 97 OCTR: 95

48/27 47/25

56 56

One-portal

2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

Symptom severity score, function score, operative time, satisfaction score, median time return to work, cost

ECTR: 0/97 OCTR: 2/95 (2 reflex sympathetic dystrophy)

Wong 2003

Prospective randomized study

2003

HK

ECTR: 30 OCTR: 30

28/2 28/2

47 47

Two-portal Intravenous regional block

2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48

Wound and pillar pain, pinch and grip strength, two-point discrimination power, operative time

ECTR: 0/30 OCTR: 0/30

Atroshi 2006

Prospective randomized study

2006

Sweden

ECTR: 63 OCTR: 65

44/19 52/13

44 44

Two-portal technique

3, 6, 12, 48

Pain in scar, median postoperative work absence, severity of symptom, functional score, QOL, hand sensation, operative time

ECTR: 2/63 (2 recurrence of symptoms, 1 for OCTR) OCTR: 1/65

Soichi Ejiri 2012

Prospective randomized controlled study

2012

Japan

ECTR: 51 OCTR: 50

48/3 43/7

59 58

Okutsu’s one-portal technique Local anesthesia

4, 12

Change in subjective symptom, impairment in daily activity, APB-DL, sensation, muscle strength

ECTR: 3/51 (3 exacerbation of symptoms) OCTR: 0/50

Larsen 2013

Prospective Single-blind randomized controlled study

2013

Denmark

ECTR: 30 OCTR: 30

22/8 48/12

54 45

One-portal technique

1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24

Pain VAS score, paresthesia, grip strength, range of motion, pillar pain, duration of sick leave

ECTR: 2/302 (neurapraxia) OCTR: 2/60 (2 infection)

Ho Jung Kang 2013

Prospective randomized controlled study

2013

South Korea

ECTR: 52 OCTR: 52

48/4 48/4

55 55

One-portal technique General anesthesia

12

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, DASH, intraoperative tourniquet time, pain, scar or pillar pain

UN

  1. UN unknown, BCTQ-S Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score, DASH Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, APB-DL abductor pollicis brevis-distal latency, ADL activity of daily living.