The benefits of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty on coronal alignment with marked femoral bowing in Asian patients

Table 3 Comparison of preoperative and postoperative knee scores in the three groups

Parameters	Group A (n = 55)	Group B (n = 63)	Group C (n = 80)	pvalue
Preoperative knee scores
Patellar score	16.8 ± 8.4	16.4 ± 9.0	17.3 ± 9.4	0.445
IKS knee score	43.8 ± 12.8	46.4 ± 11.6	49.1 ± 13.0	0.240
IKS pain score	17.1 ± 7.8	18.5 ± 6.8	20.3 ± 5.3	0.073
IKS function score	34.5 ± 13.9	38.2 ± 10.9	38.7 ± 9.9	0.320
Postoperative knee scores
Patella score	26.7 ± 2.7	26.2 ± 3.6	26.6 ± 3.4	0.583
IKS knee score	95.8 ± 3.1	94.7 ± 3.3	96.0 ± 4.9	0.392
IKS pain score	47.4 ± 3.0	46.2 ± 3.7	48.0 ± 4.0	0.108
IKS function score	91.9 ± 9.3	91.0 ± 9.0	93.0 ± 8.9	0.643

Group A: osteoarthritis with marked coronal femoral bowing; all underwent CAS-TKA. Group B: osteoarthritis with marked coronal femoral bowing; all underwent conventional TKA. Group C: osteoarthritis without marked coronal femoral bowing; all underwent conventional TKA. Values are shown as mean ± SD; p values for between-group comparison were determined by One-way ANOVA tests.
Abbreviations: HSS score Hospital for Special Surgery knee score, IKS score International Knee Society score.

ISSN: 1749-799X