Plastic deformation of the forearm in adults: an analysis of 30 cases

Table 1 Date on patients

Patient number	Age/sex (years)	Mechanism	Fractures	Radioulnar dislocation	Osteotomy	Pronation/supination (degree)
1	17/F	Skiing	SF	NO	NO	80/80
2	18/M	ERM	BF	DRD	YES	75/80
3	18/M	ERM	SF	NO	NO	85/90
4	18/M	ERM	SF	PRD	YES	80/90
5	25/M	ERM	NF	PRD	YES	70/75
6	19/M	ERM	SF	NO	NO	80/70
7	19/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	80/80
8	24/M	ERM	SF	NO	YES	90/85
9	20/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	80/80
10	23/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	75/70
11	19/M	ERM	SF	NO	NO	80/75
12	19/M	ERM	NF	DRD	YES	70/75
13	19/M	ERM	SF	NO	NO	70/70
14	24/M	ERM	SF	DRD	YES	80/70
15	20/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	70/70
16	22/M	ERM	SF	NO	NO	80/90
17	24/M	ERM	SF	DRD	YES	90/90
18	21/M	ERM	SF	NO	NO	85/80
19	19/M	ERM	NF	DRD	YES	80/70
20	18/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	30/40
21	19/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	70/75
22	20/M	ERM	NF	NO	YES	75/75
23	22/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	80/75
24	23/M	ERM	NF	DRD	YES	85/80
25	22/M	ERM	NF	NO	YES	70/70
26	19/M	ERM	HF	NO	NO	65/80
27	21/M	ERM	NF	DRD	YES	70/80
28	21/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	80/85
29	19/M	ERM	SF	DRD	YES	70/75
30	24/M	ERM	NF	NO	NO	75/75

ERM entrapment on moving rollers in machines, HF humeral fracture, BF both ulnar and radial fractures, SF single ulnar/radial fracture, NF no fractures, DRD distal radioulnar dislocation, PRD proximal radioulnar dislocation.

ISSN: 1749-799X