Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of selected trials

From: RETRACTED ARTICLE: A meta-analysis of external fixator versus intramedullary nails for open tibial fracture fixation

Author published year

Time of research

Study design

Types of fractures

Number

Materials

Gender (F/M)

Age

EF

IN

EF

IN

EF

IN

EF

IN

Antrich-Adrover [26] 1997

NA

RCT

II/IIIA/B

22

17

NA

NA

19/3

11/6

29.7 ± 19.4

32.6 ± 15.7

Cozma [24] 2000

1994.1–1998.12

CCT

IIIA/B/C

29

33

Burghele/Ilizarov

Unreamed

36/21

36 (17–70)

Henley [25] 1998

1988.1–1993.3

CCT

II/IIIA/B

68

100

Half-pin

Unreamed

53/15

79/21

33 (16–77)

33 (14–81)

Inan [19] 2007

1997.3–2000.5

RCT

IIIA

32

29

Ilizarov

Unreamed

28/4

24/5

32.3 (15–64)

31.7 (17–54)

Mohseni [20] 2011

2009.3–2011.3

RCT

IIIA/B

25

25

AO tubular plate

Unreamed

22/3

20/5

28.92 ± 8.88 (12–49)

30.8 ± 5.24 (23–39)

Shannon [21] 2002

NA

RCT

IIIA

17

13

AO tubular plate

Unreamed

10/7

7/6

34 (17–71)

44 (21–82)

Tornetta [27] 1994

1989.1–1991.1

CCT

IIIB

14

15

NA

NA

9/5

11/4

37 (19–86)

41 (21–73)

Tu [28] 1995

1992.1–1992.6

RCT

IIIA/B

18

18

Hoffmann

NA

30/6

38.5 (16–85)

Holbrook [29] 1989

1985.7–1987.9

RCT

I/II/III

28

29

AO/Hoffmann/Orthofix

NA

NA

25 (7–65)

28 (15–66)

  1. EF external fixation, IN intramedullary nails, NA not provided.