Table 1 Data of the patients
From: Does langenskiold staging have a good prognostic value in late onset tibia vara?
Age (Y) | Sex | Side | Presentation | Langenskiold Classification | Pre-Op DA | Pre-Op Intortion | Pre-Op LLD (cm) | Degrees of correction | Follow up period (Y) | Loss of correction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 12 | male | Rt. | Recent | II | -30 | - | - | 40 | 5 | 20 |
2 | 9 | Male | Bil | recent | VI | Lt. -25 | - | - | 35 | 6 | 35 |
VI | Rt. -20 | 30 | 5 | 25 | |||||||
3 | 9 | Female | Lt | Recurrent | II | -35 | 10 | 5 | 45 | 6 | 0 |
4 | 14 | male | Bil- | recent | II | Rt. -40 | 35 | - | 50 | 6 | 10 |
II | Lt. -25 | 30 | - | 45 | 5 | 0 | |||||
5 | 11 | Male | Lt | Recent | I | -40 | 15 | 2 | 50 | 4 | 0 |
6 | 12 | Female | Rt. | Recent | VI | -45 | - | 2 | 55 | 4 | 10 |
7 | 10 | Male | Rt. | Recurrent | IV | -30 | - | 1 | 40 | 5 | 15 |
8 | 9 | Female | Lt | Recurrent | VI | -45 | 25 | 4 | 55 | 4 | 15 |
9 | 12 | Female | Lt | Recent | II | -35 | - | 3 | 45 | 5 | 0 |
10 | 10 | Female | Lt | Recurrent | VI | -40 | 20 | 2 | 50 | 5 | 20 |
11 | 12 | Female | Rt. | Recurrent | IV | -40 | 10 | 1 | 50 | 6 | 0 |
12 | 10 | male | Lt | Recent | III | -30 | 25 | 4 | 40 | 5 | 10 |
13 | 8 | Female | Rt. | Recurrent | I | -35 | 20 | - | 45 | 5 | 10 |
14 | 11 | Male | Lt | Recent | I | -40 | 25 | 1 | 50 | 4 | 15 |
15 | 12 | Female | Rt. | Recent | III | -25 | - | - | 35 | 5 | 0 |
16 | 9 | Male | Lt | Recent | VI | -30 | 15 | - | 40 | 5 | 15 |
17 | 13 | Female | Rt. | Recurrent | I | -45 | - | 2 | 55 | 4 | 20 |
18 | 10 | Female | Rt. | Recent | III | -40 | 20 | 3 | 50 | 6 | 10 |
19 | 14 | Female | Lt | Recurrent | II | -30 | - | 2 | 40 | 4 | 0 |
20 | 12 | Male | Lt | Recent | I | -35 | - | 1 | 45 | 4 | 20 |