Table 3 Patient profile
From: Management outcomes in pubic diastasis: our experience with 19 patients
S. No. | Patient profile [Age in years (weight in kg)] | Type of injury | Mechanism of injury | Fixation: single(S) or double(D) plating | Associated conditions | Complications | Late problems | Majeed score [clinical (radiological)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 40 (62) | APC I | MVI | Nil | Â | Â | Â | - |
2 | 35 (68) | APC II | CI | Ant (S) | Open injury | Infection | Â | 72 (5) |
3 | 40 (75) | APC II | MVI | Ant (D) | Â | Â | Implant failure | 62 (8) |
4 | 43 (66) | APC II | PI | Ant (S) | Â | Â | Â | 78 (3) |
5 | 54 (60) | APC II | PI | Ant (D) | Â | Â | Â | 72 (6) |
6 | 62 (76) | APC II | CI | Ant (S) | Hypotension | Â | Â | 64 (10) |
7 | 52 (81) | APC II | MVI | Ant (D) | Â | Â | Â | 74 (6) |
8 | 32 (85) | APC II | MCI | Ant (S) | Â | Â | Implant failure with bladder herniati-on | 56 (13) |
9 | 46 (72) | APC II | PI | Ant (D) | Bladder injury | Â | Â | 72 (6) |
10 | 41 (69) | APC II | MCI | Ant (S) | Â | Â | Â | 76 (7) |
11 | 43 (55) | APC II | CI | Ant (D) | Â | Â | Â | 66 (10) |
12 | 25 (66) | APC II | PI | Ant (D) | Â | Â | Implant failure | 54 (18) |
13 | 20 (72) | APC II | CI | Ant (S) | Â | Â | Â | 70 (7) |
14 | 55 (80) | APC II | PI | Ant (S) | Hypotension | Â | Â | 66 (14) |
15 | 61 (73) | APC III (Saroiliac joint disruption) | CI | Ant(S) + Post | Â | DVT, Infection | Â | Â |
16 | 33 (66) | APC III (sacrum fracture) | CI | Ant(S) + Post | Â | Â | Â | 66 (10) |
17 | 38 (64) | APC III (Sacroiliac joint disrupti-on) | PI | Ant(S) + Post | Â | Â | Â | 62(12) |
18 | 25 (76) | APC III (ilium fracture) | MCI | Ant(D) + Post | Hypotension | Â | Â | 72 (8) |
19 | 22 (58) | APC III (ilium fracture) | CI | Ant(S) + Post | Hypotension | Â | Â | 74 (6) |