Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation matrix of changes of scale scores.

From: Functional improvement after Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision: New observations on the dimensional nature of outcome

 

D1

D2

D3

D4

D5

D6

D7

D8

D9

D1

1.00

-.10

.26**

.27**

.28**

.47**

.54**

.27**

.13

N

172

172

132

161

170

167

168

146

93

D2

 

1.00

.17*

.21**

.03

.14

.20*

.17*

.28**

N

 

172

132

161

170

167

168

146

93

D3

  

1.00

.27**

-.03

.33**

.30**

.63**

.26*

N

  

142

133

138

135

136

128

84

D4

   

1.00

.02

.30**

.31**

.27**

.17

N

   

172

168

164

165

149

97

D5

    

1.00

.47**

.40**

.02

.10

N

    

181

176

175

155

100

D6

     

1.00

.71**

.26**

.32*

N

     

177

175

153

99

D7

      

1.00

.36**

.17

N

      

177

153

99

D8

       

1.00

.24*

N

       

160

101

D9

        

1.00

N

        

105

  1. First number in every cell (D1-D9) specifies correlation coefficient, second number (N) – number of cases included into calculations.
  2. D1-D9 indicate changes of scale scores from baseline to follow-up for SF-36 PCS (D1), SF-36 MCS (D2), Physician Severity Assessment (D3), LEAS (D4), WOMAC Stiffness (D5), WOMAC Pain (D6), WOMAC Difficulty of Functioning (D7), KSS Functional Assessment (D8), KSS Knee Rating (D9).
  3. ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
  4. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Back to article page

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X