Open Access

The characteristics of the mechanoreceptors of the hip with arthrosis

  • Miguel RB Moraes1Email author,
  • Maria LC Cavalcante1Email author,
  • José AD Leite1,
  • José N Macedo1,
  • Marianna LB Sampaio1,
  • Vagnaldo F Jamacaru1 and
  • Mariana G Santana1
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research20116:58

DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-58

Received: 9 October 2009

Accepted: 16 November 2011

Published: 16 November 2011

Abstract

Mechanoreceptors have been extensively studied in different joints and distinct signals that convey proprioceptive information to the cortex. Several clinical reports have established a link between the number of mechanoreceptors and a deficient proprioceptive system; however, little or no literature suggest concentration of mechanoreceptors might be affected by hip arthrosis. The purpose of this study is first to determine the existence of mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings in the hip joint and to distinguish between their conditions: those with arthrosis and without arthrosis. Samples of 45 male hips were analyzed: 30 taken from patients with arthrosis that were submitted to total arthroplasty and 15 taken from male cadavers without arthrosis. The patients' ages ranged from 38 to75 years (average 56.5) and the cadavers' ages ranged from 21 to 50 years (average 35.5). The capsule, labrum, and femoral head ligament tissues were obtained during the arthroplasty procedure from 30 patients with arthrosis and from 15 male cadavers. The tissue was cut into fragments of around 3 mm. Each fragment was then immediately stained with gold chloride 1% solution and divided into sections of 6 μm thickness. The Mann-Whitney test was used for two groups and the ANOVA, Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests for more than two groups. Results show the mechanoreceptors (Pacini, Ruffini and Golgi corpuscles) and free nerve endings are present in the capsule, femoral head ligament, and labrum of the hip joint. When all the densities of the nerve endings were examined with regard to those with arthrosis and those without arthrosis, the mechanoreceptors of cadavers without arthrosis were found to be more pronounced and an increase in free nerve endings could be observed (p = 0.0082). Further studies, especially electrophysiological studies, need to be carried out to clarify the functions of the mechanoreceptors in the joints.

Background

The proprioceptive system preserves the integrity and stabilizes the joints. It includes peripheral mechanoreceptors that detect distinct signals and convey the proprioceptive information to the cortex. These afferent and efferent feedback systems help to improve coordination of movement and posture thus prevent injuries from occurring. This function represents the first line of action taken by the mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings with regard to the ligament, muscle joints, and capsules [1, 2].

In 1874, Rauber became the first scientist to identify the Pacini corpuscle in the human capsule [3]. Since then, mechanoreceptors have been extensively studied in different joints [414]. However, only a few investigators have carried out comparative studies of the concentration of mechanoreceptors in the hip [1517]. A correlation of the number of nerve endings and the deficit of the proprioceptive system has been found in joint diseases. The performance of the proprioceptive system affects joint stability and can be a contributory cause of lesion of the cartilage [10, 12, 18, 19].

This study has identified and quantified the mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings in the femoral head ligament, labrum, and capsule joint. These structures serve to stabilize hip joints. The density was measured and compared in 30 arthrosis and 15 normal hips joints. The morphological features were based on Freeman and Wyke's classification [20]. This research has a significant clinical application because proprioceptive training plays an important role in the prevention and treatment of orthopedic lesions.

Methods

Forty-five hips were analyzed both from male patients with advanced arthrosis who had been submitted to total arthroplasty and from male cadavers. 30 hips were obtained from patients with arthrosis during the arthroplasty procedure. The ages ranged from 38 to 75 years (SD 56.5). Fifteen hips were from cadavers without arthrosis. The ages ranged from 21 to 50 years (SD 35.5).

Radiographs were taken before the tissue was removed and the degree of arthrosis examined on the basis of Bombelli's classification [21]. This study was approved by Ethics Committee No. 007.06.01 of the Federal University of Ceara.

An incision was made in the hips by means of the Watson Jones' approach as well as by employing the arthroplasty procedure, of which the capsule, labrum and femoral head ligament tissues were removed (Figure 1). Following this, the tissue was cut into fragments of around 3mm. Each fragment was immediately stained with 1% solution of gold chloride and divided into sections of 6 μm thickness. These sections were viewed through a light microscope [22].
Figure 1

Pictures showing the structures (A) Articular capsule hip (B) Femoral head ligament C) Acetabular labrum.

Four types of nerve endings were based on Freeman and Wike's classification: Type I (Ruffini) low-threshold and slow adapting; Type II (Pacini) low-threshold and fast adapting; Type III (Golgi) low-threshold and slow adapting; and Type VI (Free nerve ending) high-threshold, nocireceptors (Figure 2). A histomorphometry evaluation was undertaken and the density was determined by means of the point-counting method (40/400×) [23, 24].
Figure 2

Microscopy optical images with (A) Ruffini's corpuscle (400x) (B) Pacini's corpuscle (400x) (C) Golgi's corpuscle (400x) (D) Zimny method with goldchloride 1% solution. Only in (D) arrows pointing Pacini corpuscle (→), Free nerve ending (----›) and Golgi corpuscle (— □ □›) (100x).

Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (ks) test was applied to all categories. The parametric data were measured by using mean and standard deviation. The non-parametric test included the quartile interval, and the minimum and maximum median values. The statistical method employed for making a comparison between the two groups was the Mann-Whitney Test. When there were more than two groups, the ANOVA, Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied. When all the groups were compared, the difference between them was significant when p was less than 0.05 (Graphpad prism software 5.00; San Diego, CA; http://www.graphpad.com).

Results

With regard to the 15 cadaveric hips without arthrosis, the histological evaluation of the capsule, femoral head ligament, and labrum acetabular showed that the tissue had distinctive characteristics. The joint capsule showed the presence of dense conjunctive tissue, a few conjunctive cells and fibroblasts. In addition, there were parallel and abundant collagen fibers.

The femoral head ligament showed the presence of superficial collagen fibers and was in a longitudinal direction. The deep collagen fibers showed signs of disorganization and an increased number of vessels. The acetabular labrum had thick and parallel collagen.

There was a reduction in the number of collagen fibers and vessels in the arthrosis group. However, there were no morphological differences between the mechanoreceptors in each group.

In both groups, arthrosis and normal hip, the Ruffini corpuscles appeared to be globular ramifications with a diameter of around 100 mμ. The Pacini corpuscles had a spherical shape with external lamellas and measured 50 - 100 mμ. The Golgi corpuscles proved to be bigger (up to 400 mμ) and had a helical shape, with long spindles. The free nerve endings were fine and without any set pattern.

In the case of the patients with arthrosis, there was a significant reduction of Golgi corpuscles (0.008/mm2) when compared with Pacini corpuscles (0.013/mm2) (P < 0.001) and free nerve endings (0.012/mm2) (P < 0.01) (Figure 3 and table 1). However, in the group without arthrosis, there was a significant increase in the Pacini corpuscle's density (0.017/mm2) when compared with Ruffini (0.012/mm2) (P < 0.01) and Golgi (0.011/mm2) (P < 0.001) corpuscles (Figure 4 and table 2).
Figure 3

Total density of the mechanoreceptors in hip with arthrosis.

Table 1

Total density of the mechanoreceptors in hip with arthrosis

Mechanoreceptor

Arthrosis

 

Mean

SD

Ruffini

0,010

0,005

Pacini

0,013

0,006

Golgi

0.008

0,005

FNE

0,012

0,006

Note: FNE = nerve free ending, SD = standard deviation

Figure 4

Total density of the mechanoreceptors in hip without arthrosis.

Table 2

Total density of the mechanoreceptors in hip without arthrosis

Mechanoreceptor

Without arthrosis

 

Mean

SD

Ruffini

0,012

0,005

Pacini

0,017

0,005

Golgi

0,011

0,002

FNE

0,013

0,004

Note: FNE = free nerve ending, SD = standard deviation

When the total number of nerve ending densities were compared between patients with arthrosis and those without arthrosis, the mechanoreceptors of the cadavers without arthrosis were found to be more pronounced and a decrease in the number of the nerve endings could be observed among the patients with arthrosis (P = 0.0082) (Figure 5 and table 3).
Figure 5

Total density of the mechanoreceptors in hip without arthrosis and with arthrosis.

Table 3

Total density of the mechanoreceptors in hip without arthrosis and with arthosis

Without arthrosis

Arthrosis

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

0,053

0,007

0,044

0,011

Note: SD = standard deviation

Discussion

Mechanoreceptors have been identified in structures such as capsule, ligament, and fibrocartilage tissues from human and animal specimens [2, 4, 6, 11, 2527]. There has been an increase in the status of mechanoreceptors in orthopedic diseases and this has led to a great deal of research into the alterations that occur in the joints [4, 9, 10, 12, 28]. However, no references have been found in the literature of comparative studies between patients with or without arthrosis in the hip.

Currently, investigators are conducting morphological and electrophysiological studies of these structures. In the current study, a histomorphological analysis was described that allowed us to visualize mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings and distinguish them in different conditions between subjects with and without arthrosis.

Gold chloride was used to stain the mechanoreceptors to allow each structure to be distinguished. This technique was employed by Amir, Cavalcante and Michelson [4, 5, 13] to identify cells, collagens, fascicular regions and conjunctive tissue. The immunohistochemical has revealed further details, although at a high cost [6, 7, 26, 2931].

The morphological features of the mechanoreceptors observed were similar to those identified by Freeman and Wyke [20] and it also was related by others authors when they used the same classification to describe elbow ligaments [11], sinus tarsi syndrome [32] and ruptured knee ligaments [33].

Mechanoreceptors were found in three structures that serve to stabilize the hip joint: the capsule, femoral head ligament, and labrum and our experiments closely followed the work of most other investigators who have described nerve endings in the hip joint [15, 16].

When the groups with and without arthrosis were compared, there was a significantly greater reduction in the Pacini type (P < 0.0351) than the Ruffini type (P = 0.2674). The Pacini corpuscles are low threshold and able to adapt quickly while the Ruffini corpuscles only adapt slowly [3, 20]. Additionally, it means that there was a greater loss of nerve endings among those that adapted rapidly to the groups with arthrosis.

With regard to the total number of densities of the mechanoreceptors in the two groups, there was a significant reduction in the arthrosis group (P = 0.0082). Morisawa, Franchi, Muratli and Kontinen [10, 12, 28, 34] also observed a decrease in the other disease joints. This is strong evidence that these structures play a significant role in the proprioceptive system. However, the amount of mechanoreceptors present could be affected by factors such as hip diseases, in addition to the proprioceptive system and stability of the joints. Our results showed that there was a considerable reduction of mechanoreceptors when the hip joint was subject to arthrosis.

Further studies, especially in electrophysiological areas, need to be carried out to clarify the functions of the mechanoreceptors in the joints, as the treatment of most orthopedic diseases is beginning to include programs for proprioceptive rehabilitation [27, 3541]. In the future, people who have slow reflexes, lax joints, joint incongruity, and loss of muscle power will benefit from improvements in proprioception.

Conclusion

The study of mechanoreceptors is important because it improves knowledge about the proprioception system and helps to develop an efficient rehabilitation program.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPQ) and Legal Medicine Institute (IML - Ce)

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Post-Graduate Departament of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará

References

  1. Hagert E, Forsgren S, Ljung BO: Differences in the presence of mechanoreceptors and nerve structures between wrist ligaments may imply differential roles in wrist stabilization. J Orthop Res. 2005, 23: 757-763. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hagert E, Elias MG, Forsgrew S, Lyung BO: Immunohistochemical analysis of wrist ligament innervation in relation to its structural composition. J Hand Surg. 2007, 32 (1): 30-36. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.10.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zimny LM: Mechanoreceptors in articular tissues. J Anat. 1988, 182: 163-32.Google Scholar
  4. Amir G, Lowe J, Finsterbush A: Histomorphometric Analysis of innervation of the anterior cruciate ligament in osteoarthitis. J Orthop Res. 1995, 13: 78-82. 10.1002/jor.1100130112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavalcante MLC, Rodrigues CJ, Mattar R: Mechanoreceptors and nerve endings of the triangular fibrocartilage in the human wrist. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 432-435. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen YG, Mcclinton MA, Da Silva MF, Shaw Wilgis EF: Innervation of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints: A microanatomic and histologic study of the nerve endings. J Hand Surg. 2000, 25: 128-133. 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ejnisman B, Faloppa F, Carrera EF, Andreoli CV, Alves MTS, Odashiro A, Cohen M: Immunohistochemistry study of the human mechanoreceptors in the glenohumeral inferior ligament. Rev Bras Ortop. 2002, 37: 289-298.Google Scholar
  8. Vuillerme N, Chenu O, Demongeot J, Payan Y: Improving human ankle joint position sense using an artificial tongue-placed tactile. Neurosc Lett. 2006, 405: 19-23. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Vangsness CT, Eniss M, Taylor JG, Atkinson R: Neural anatomy of the glenoumeral ligaments labrum and bursa subacromial. J Arthroscopy. 1995, 11: 180-184. 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90064-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Morisawa Y: Morphological study of mechanoreceptors on the coracoacromial ligament. J Orthop Sci. 1998, 3: 102-110. 10.1007/s007760050029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Petrie S, Collins JG, Solomonow M, Wink C, Chuinard R, D' Rambrosia R: Mechanoreceptors in the human elbow ligaments. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23: 512-518. 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80470-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franchi A, Zaccherotti G, Aglietti P: Neural System of the human posterior cruciate ligament in osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1995, 10 (5): 679-682. 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80215-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Michelson JD, Hutchins C: Mechanoreceptors in human ankle ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995, 77 (2): 219-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Moraes MRB, Leite JAD, Ferreira FV, Castro AJO, Santana MG: Histomorphometric evaluation of mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings in human lateral ankle ligaments. Foot Ankle Int. 2008, 29 (1): 87-90. 10.3113/FAI.2008.0087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim YT: The nerve endings of the acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1995, 320: 176-181.Google Scholar
  16. Leunig M, Beck M, Stauffer E, Hertel R, Ganz R: Free nerve endings in the ligamentum capitis femoris. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000, 71 (5): 452-454. 10.1080/000164700317381117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kampa RJ, Prasthofer A, Watt DJL, Pattison RM: The internervous safe zone for incision of the capsule of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007, 89-B: 971-976. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Barrack Rl, Skinner HB, Cook SD, Haddad RJ: Effect of articular disease and total knee arthroplasty on knee joint-position sense. J Neurophysiol. 1983, 50 (3): 684-687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Barret DS, Cobb AG, Bentley G: Joint proprioception in normal osteoarthritic and replaced knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991, 73 (1): 53-56.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman MA, Wyke B: Articular reflexes at the ankle joint: an electromyographic study of normal and abnormal influences of ankle joint mechanoreceptors upon reflex activity in the leg muscles. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967, 54: 990-1001.Google Scholar
  21. Bombelli R, Santore RF, Poss R: Mechanics of the normal and osteoarthritis hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1983, 182: 69-78.Google Scholar
  22. Zimny LM, Onge M, Schutte M: A modified gold chloride method for demonstration of nerve endings in frozen sections. Stain Technology. 1985, 60: 305-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gundersen HJG, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Moller A, Nilsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg FB, Sorensen FB, Vesterby A, Wester MJ: Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Apmis. 1988, 96 (5): 379-394.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA: Stereological tools in biomedical research. An Acad Bras Ciências. 2003, 76: 469-486.Google Scholar
  25. O' Connor BL, Gonzales J: Mechanoreceptors of the medial collateral ligament of the cat knee joint. J Anat. 1979, 129: 719-729.Google Scholar
  26. Del Valle ME, Harwin SF, Maestro A, Murcia A, Vega JA: Immunohistochemical analysis of mechanoreceptors in the human posterior cruciate ligament: a demonstration of its proprioceptive role and clinical relevance. J Arthroplasty. 1998, 13: 916-922. 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90199-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi A, Grigg P: Characteristics of hip joint mechanoreceptors in the cat. Neurophysiology. 1982, 47: 1029-1042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Muratli HH, Biçimoglu A, Tabak YA, Çelebi L, Pakel I: Mechanoreceptor evaluation of hip joint capsule and ligamentum capitis femoris in developmental hip dysplasia: a preliminary study. J Pediat Orthop. 2003, 13 (5): 229-302.Google Scholar
  29. Nakakura-Ohshima K, Hayashi S, Atsumi Y, Wakisaka S, Nozawa-Inoue K, Maeda T: Immunocytochemical detection of S-100 B in the periodontal Ruffini endings in the rat incisor. Neurosc Lett. 1998, 258: 163-166. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00872-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kennedy WR, Wendelschafer-Crabb G: The innervations of human epidermis. J Neurological Sci. 1998, 155: 184-90.Google Scholar
  31. Wu JP, Kirk TB, Zheng MH: Study of the collagen structure in the superficial zone and physiological state of articular cartilage using a 3D confocal imaging technique. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008, 3 (29): 1-11.Google Scholar
  32. Akiyama K, Takakura Y, Tomita Y, Sugimoto K, Tamai S: Neurohistology of the sinus tarsi syndrome. J Orthop Sci. 1999, 4: 299-303. 10.1007/s007760050107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Geourgoulis D, Pappa L, Moebius U, Pappa S, Papageorgius CO, Agnantis NJ, Soucacos PN: The presence of proprioceptive mechanoreceptors in the remmants of the ruptured ACL as a possible source of re-innervation of the ACL autograft. Knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001, 9 (6): 364-368. 10.1007/s001670100240.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Konttinen YT, Tianen VM, Barrena EG, Hukkanen M, Salo J: Innervation of the joint and role of neuropeptide. An NY Acad Sci. 2006, 1069: 149-154. 10.1196/annals.1351.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Takebayashi T, Yamashita T, Minaki Y, Ishii S: Mechanosensitive afferent units in the lateral ligament of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997, 79 (3): 490-493. 10.1302/0301-620X.79B3.7285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Konradsen L: Sensori-motor control of the uninjured and injured human ankle. J Electromygor Kinesiol. 2002, 12 (3): 1999-2003.Google Scholar
  37. Tibone JE, Fechter J, Kao JT: Evaluation of a proprioception pathway in patients with stable and unstable shoulders with somatosensory cortical evoked potentials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997, 6: 440-443. 10.1016/S1058-2746(97)70050-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt R, Cordier E, Bertsch C, Elis E, Neller S, Benesch S, Herbst A, Rosenbaum D, Claes LR: Reconstruction of the lateral ligaments: Do the anatomical procedures restore physiologic ankle kinematics?. Foot Ankle Int. 2004, 25: 31-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sampaio TCFVS, Souza JME: Reeducação proprioceptiva nas lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior do joelho. Rev Bras Ortop. 1994, 29 (5): 303-308. Proprioceptive re-education in lesions of the anterior cruciate ligament of the kneeGoogle Scholar
  40. Beard DJ, Dood CAF, Trundle HR, Simpson AHRW: Proprioception enhancement for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. A prospective randomised trial of two physiotherapy regimes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994, 76: 654-659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Macefield VG: Physiological characteristics of low-threshold mechanoreceptors in joints, muscle and skin human subjects. Clin Experimen Pharmaphysiol. 2004, 32: 135-144.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Moraes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement