Open Access

The Edinburgh variant of a talar body fracture: a case report

  • Nicholas D Clement1Email author,
  • Sally-Ann Phillips1 and
  • Leela C Biant1
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research20105:92

DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-5-92

Received: 13 May 2010

Accepted: 9 December 2010

Published: 9 December 2010

Abstract

We describe a novel closed pantalar dislocation with an associated sagittal medial talar body and medial malleolus fractures. Closed reduction was attempted unsuccessfully. Open reduction was performed, revealing a disrupted talonavicular joint with instability of the calcaneocuboid joint. This configuration required stabilisation with an external fixator. There were no signs of avascular necrosis, or arthrosis at 15 months follow but is currently using a stick to mobilise.

Introduction

Talar fractures account for 0.3% of all fractures, with an incidence of 3.2 per 100,000 and are predominantly a male injury (82:18) [1]. Talar body fractures occur in only 7% to 38% of all talar fractures [210]. Sneppen et al [11] classified talar body fractures into five distinct groups: compression (talocrural joint), shearing (coronal or sagittal), posterior tubercle, lateral tubercle and crush fractures. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association [12] and Delee [13] have since further classified these fractures, but no classification to date recognises a pantalar dislocation associated with a talar body facture.

We describe a previously unclassified closed pantalar dislocation with an associated sagittal medial talar body and medial malleolus fractures.

Case report

A 32 year old postman fell whilst walking in a forest, sustaining a hyper plantar flexion and external rotation injury to his right ankle. He presented to the Accident and Emergency department with a grossly swollen and deformed right ankle. The skin was intact, with a minor abrasion over the lateral malleolus. There was no neurovascular deficit. Radiographs demonstrated a fracture of the talar body and the medial malleolus with dislocation of the talus (Figure 1). After two failed attempts at closed reduction under sedation in the emergency department we abandon further attempts to avoid additional soft tissue damage and any further insult to the residual blood supply to the talar body. An urgent computerised tomography scan was obtained with subsequent three dimensional reconstruction (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Anterio-posterior and lateral radiograph at time of presentation.

Figure 2

Three dimensional computerised tomography reconstruction scan pre-operatively with the tibia and fibular removed.

Six hours after presentation open reduction was performed primarily through an anteromedial approach, a medial malleolar osteotomy was not necessary as this was already fractured giving adequate access, as described by Rammelt and Zwipp [14]. The posterior medial fragment was comminuted and fixation was no possible, the fragments were excised. The talonavicular joint was not reducible and a further anterolateral approach was made to enable reduction. The calcaneocuboid joint was unstable, so Kirschner (K) wires were used to hold the reduction. Despite this the talonavicular joint remained unstable and a bridging external fixator was used to hold the reduction (Figure 3). The medial malleolus was fixed with a single screw. He remained non-weight bearing for 6 weeks where upon the frame and K-wires were removed. Radiographs at 6 weeks (Figure 4) demonstrated Hawkins sign, with no signs of avascular necrosis or arthrosis at 15 months follow up (Figure 5). The range of movement continues to improve, the current range is: plantar flexion 20 degrees, dorsiflexion 10 degrees, inversion 20 degrees, and eversion 10 degrees, with full power (5/5 MRC scale) in all planes. He currently has minimal pain (4/10 on the visual analogue scale), tending to be after prolonged standing/walking. He has not yet returned to full employment and still uses a stick to mobilise.
Figure 3

Anterio-posterior and lateral radiograph post reduction.

Figure 4

Anterio-posterior and lateral radiograph at 6 weeks.

Figure 5

Anterio-posterior and lateral radiograph at 15 months.

Discussion

We describe a novel variant of a talar body fracture: closed pantalar dislocation with an associated sagittal medial talar body and medial malleolus fractures. To date no classification has described this fracture pattern. Hafez et al. [15] described a similar fracture pattern. They report a closed coronal fracture through the body of the talus with pantalar dislocation; the talus had "rotated 90 degrees laterally" in the transverse plane. Whereas, we observed a sagittal fracture and a pantalar dislocation with rotation in a coronal plane (Figure 2).

A unique aspect of this case was the observed instability of the calcaneocuboid joint, which is widened in Figure 2. We feel this was torn open superiorly with the hyper plantar flexion, allowing the talar head to dislocate. After reduction the talonavicular joint remained unstable, due to plantar flexion opening the unstable calcaneocuboid joint and required stabilisation with an external fixator.

Our case demonstrated Hawkins sign at 6 weeks post injury, which is a sign of remodelling and is highly predictive of revitalisation of the talar body: radiolucent zone at in the subcortcal bone of the talar dome (Figure 4) [14]. Avascular necrosis is a complication that would be expected following such an injury pattern [16]. However, injuries associated with a medial malleolus fracture, as we have described are less likely to develop avascular necrosis. This is due to preservation of the deltoid ligament and the associated deltoid branch of the posterior tibial artery supplying the talar body [17, 18].

The prognosis of talar fractures/dislocations is related to the severity of the injury, length of time before relocation and early fixation. The infection rate varies depending on definition, from 3.1% deep infection rate to 6.2% if superficial infections are also included [19]. The majority infections occur after an open fracture which carries a worse prognosis [20]. The risk of avascular necrosis of the talar body is related to the type of fracture, with non-displaced talar body fractures being associated with a 5% to 44% risk, whereas displaced talar body fractures the risk is about 50% [16], which is further increase if the injury is open [21, 22]. Post-traumatic arthrosis varies from 16 to 100% after talar body fractures [21, 23]. Malunion can produce significant alteration in load across the ankle and subtalar joints and result in arthrosis [21]. Anatomic and stable reduction of talar body fractures is of paramount importance for obtaining a reasonable functional outcome [21]. There is no apparent correlation between talar body fracture classification and outcome, which maybe explained by the low incidence and variation of such injuries [14]. Approximately 80% patients will have good to excellent clinical results after early internal fixation [23]. The reported case, according to the aforementioned criteria, should have a good prognosis as it was closed and underwent immediate operative reduction with early signs of revascularisation.

This case presents a new variant of talar body fracture, with a new rotatory element and a disruption of the calcaneocuboid joint. Urgent open reduction should be employed with adequate imaging to plan the approach and potential fixation of the fracture.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, Caeser B: Epidemiology of acute fractures: A review. Injury. 2006, 37: 691-697. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Coltart WD: Aviator's astragalus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1952, 34: 545-66.Google Scholar
  3. Elgafy H, Ebraheim NA, Tile M, Stephen D, Kase J: Fractures of the talus: experience of two level 1 trauma centers. Foot Ankle Int. 2000, 21: 1023-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Higgins TF, Baumgaertner MR: Diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the talus: a comprehensive review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. 1999, 20: 595-605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kenwright J, Taylor RG: Major injuries of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1970, 52: 36-48.Google Scholar
  6. Kleiger B: Fractures of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1948, 30: 735-44.Google Scholar
  7. Mindell ER, Cisek EE, Kartalian G, Dziob JM: Late results of injuries to the talus: analysis of forty cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1963, 45: 221-45.Google Scholar
  8. Pennal GF: Fractures of the talus. Clin Orthop. 1963, 30: 53-63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Santavirta S, Seitsalo S, Kiviluoto O, Myllynen P: Fractures of the talus. J Trauma. 1984, 24: 986-9. 10.1097/00005373-198411000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Szyszkowitz R, Reschauer R, Seggl W: Eighty-five talus fractures treated by ORIF with five to eight years of follow-up study of 69 patients. Clin Orthop. 1985, 199: 97-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sneppen O, Christensen SB, Krogsoe O, Lorentzen J: Fracture of the body of the Talus. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977, 48: 317-24. 10.3109/17453677708988775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audigé L: Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007, 21 (Suppl 10): S1-133. 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Delee JC: Fractures and dislocations of the foot. Surgery of the foot and ankle. Edited by: Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. 1993, Mosby, 2: 1465-1703. 6Google Scholar
  14. Rammelt S, Zwipp H: Review: Talar neck and body fractures. Injury, Int J Care Injured. 2009, 40: 120-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hafez MA, Bawarish MA, Guvvala R: Closed Talar Body Fracture with Talonavicular Dislocation; A Case Report. Foot Ankle Int. 2000, 21: 599-601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuner EH, Lindenmaier HL, Münst P: Talus fractures. Major fractures of the pilon, the talus and the calcaneus. Edited by: Schatzker J, Tscherne H. 1993, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 72-85.Google Scholar
  17. Mulfinger GL, Trueta J: The blood supply of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970, 52: 160-167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wildenauer E: Die Blutversorgung des Talus. Z Anat. 1950, 115: 32-10.1007/BF00522646.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Schuind F, Andrianne Y, Burny F: Fractures et luxations de l'astragale Revue de 359 cas. Acta Orthop Belg. 1983, 49: 652-689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. March JL, Saltzman CL, Inverson M, Shapiro DS: Major open injuries of the talus. J Orthop Trauma. 1995, 9 (5): 371-376. 10.1097/00005131-199505000-00002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindvall E, Haidukewych G, DiPasquale T: Open reduction and stable fixation of isolated, displaced talar neck and body fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86-A: 2229-2234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vallier HA, Nork SE, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ: Surgical treatment of talar body fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 1716-1724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schulze W, Richter J, Russe O: Surgical treatment of talus fractures: a retrospective study of 80 cases followed for 1-15 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002, 73: 344-351. 10.1080/000164702320155374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Clement et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement