Alendronate increases BMD at appendicular and axial skeletons in patients with established osteoporosis
© Qin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 17 October 2006
Accepted: 21 May 2007
Published: 21 May 2007
To identify high-risk patients and provide pharmacological treatment is one of the effective approaches in prevention of osteoporotic fractures. This study investigated the effect of 12-month Alendronate treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover biochemical markers in postmenopausal women with one or more non-traumatic fractures, i.e. patients with established osteoporosis.
A total of 118 Hong Kong postmenopausal Chinese women aged 50 to 75 with low-energy fracture at distal radius (Colles' fracture) were recruited for BMD measurement at lumbar spine and non-dominant hip using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). 47 women with BMD T-score below -2 SD at either side were identified as patients with established osteoporosis and then randomized into Alendronate group (n = 22) and placebo control group (n = 25) for BMD measurement at spine and hip using DXA and distal radius of the non-fracture side by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), and bone turnover markers, including bone forming alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and bone resorbing urinary Deoxypyridinoline (DPD). All measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months.
Alendronate treatment significantly increased BMD, more in weight-bearing skeletons (5.1% at spine and 2.5% at hip) than in non-weight bearing skeleton (0.9% at distal radius) after 12 months treatment. Spine T-score was significant improved in Alendronate group (p < 0.01) (from -2.2 to -1.9) but not in control placebo group. The Alendronate treatment effect was explained by significant suppression of bone turnover.
12 months Alendronate treatment was effective to increase BMD at both axial and appendicular skeletons in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.
Our recent retrospective study shows that postmenopausal women with low-energy Colles' fractures are associated with osteoporosis . Similar studies are also reported before that osteoporotic fracture is often seen in high risk patients such as those with established osteoporosis, i.e. osteoporotic patients with one or more low-energy fractures [2–4]. Osteoporotic fracture incurs high morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure [3, 5–7]. The current consensus for effective prevention of osteoporotic fracture is to identify the high-risk patients and put them on effective pharmacological intervention programs.
Anti-resorptive drugs such as Bisphosphonates have been proven to be effective for treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention in patients with osteoporosis [7–10]. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of 12-month Alendronate treatment in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD) was used as the end-point and bone turnover biochemical markers were evaluated for monitoring bone metabolism in response to drug treatment effects.
In order to confirm our treatment effects, we identified patients with established osteoporosis for treatment and used bone mineral density (BMD) at both axial and appendicular skeletons as the end-point for evaluations.
Subject recruitment and identification of patients with established osteoporosis
One hundred eighteen postmenopausal women, aged 50–75 with one low-energy fracture at distal radius (Colles' fracture) in the past 5 years, were concurrently recruited form the hospital of the investigators as described in our recent study . Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent was obtained. Exclusion criteria were women under hormonal replacement therapy or drug treatment known to affect bone metabolism, with condition such as hypo- or hyperparathyroidism and hypo- or hyperthyroidism, renal or liver disease. In order to avoid the possible adverse effect of Alendronate on gastrointestinal tract, women with history of gastrointestinal tract disease or chronic stomach disease were also excluded [8, 9]. All subjects had BMD measurement at lumbar spine (L2-L4) and non-dominant hip (femoral neck) by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) (Norland XR36, Norland Corporation, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA). Patients with established osteoporosis were those found to have T-score below -2 SD at spine or hip [1, 6, 11]. Finally, a total of around 40%, i.e. 47 subjects were identified and recruited as patients with established osteoporosis and randomized into Alendronate treatment group (n = 22) and placebo control group (n = 25). Body height and body weight were measured and body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was calculated.
10 mg alendronate was used for subjects in Alendronate group, together with 1200 mg calcium supplement per day, as it dose was reported as an effective dose for the same study population for Hong Kong Chinese [8, 9]. Control group was given 'placebo tablets', i.e.1200 mg calcium supplement per day. The intervention lasted 12 months.
Monitoring treatment effects
In order to investigate systemic treatment effects, clinical important axial and appendicular skeletal sides prone to osteoporotic fractures were selected for BMD measurement, including areal BMD (g/cm2) at spine and hip measured by DXA and volumetric BMD (g/cm3) of the non-fracture distal radius using a multilayer peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) (Densiscan 2000, Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland). For pQCT measurement, a standard program with 16 tomographs was used. Thickness of each layer is 1 mm with 1.5 mm interval between each other. Trabecular BMD (tBMD) in a core volume (central 50% area of total bone area) and integral BMD (iBMD) within the total volume of the ultradistal radius were obtained from the first ten distal tomographs. Cortical BMD (cBMD) was obtained from the pure cortical compartment of distal disphysis from the six proximal tomographs. Technical details are described previously [1, 12]. Quality control scans for both DXA and pQCT were performed daily with a manufacture-supplied anthropometric phantom, which showed a precision error of 1.2% for DXA and 0.3% for pQCT reported for the same reference population [1, 12].
Bone turnover biochemical markers
Biochemical markers were used to monitor the changes of bone turnover after Alendronate treatment and compared with placebo control group. These included serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) as a bone formation marker by collecting the blood sample at the same day time and urinary Deoxypyridinoline (DPD) as a bone resorption marker by collecting urine as the first morning void sample on the same day. Both blood and urine samples were then stored in -80 C freezer before biochemical assay. BALP was measured with a specific lectin precipitation method using autoanalyser (Abbott VP system) and DPD was measured by commercial available ELISA kit PYRILINKS-D (Metra Biosystem, USA) [8, 13]. Serum BALP and urinary DPD were measured at both baseline and follow-up at 6 and 12 months.
Dropout and facture case
Both number and reason of dropout was recorded. Fracture cases during 12-month treatment period was also recorded and confirmed radiographically.
Un-paired T-test was used to study the homogeneity on the randomization of two groups at baseline. ANOVA was used to detect the difference in BMD at both axial and appendicular skeletons at baseline, 6 and 12 months for each group and between two groups. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. SPSS 11.0 statistical program (444 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA) was used for data analysis.
Randomization of subjects for two study groups
Anthropometric variables and DXA T-score. Homogeneity in anthropometric and BMD and DXA T-score in patients with established osteoporosis compared between Alendronate group and placebo control group (Data: mean ± SD)
Number of subjects
60.7 ± 6.4
59.1 ± 6.3
Years since menopause (YSM) (years)
11.2 ± 7.5
9.1 ± 5.7
154.3 ± 5.9
153.9 ± 5.3
54.3 ± 9.5
56.8 ± 8.5
Body mass index (BMI)
22.7 ± 3.0
23.9 ± 2.5
-2.21 ± 0.78
-2.20 ± 0.81
-1.53 ± 1.03
-1.70 ± 0.51
BMD at baseline and its changes compared between two study groups
BMD data at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Comparison of BMD at baseline and its changes at 6- and 12-months in patients with established osteoporosis compared between Alendronate group and placebo control group (Data: mean ± SD)
Placebo control group (n = 25)
Alendronate group (n = 22)
% difference +
% difference +
0.718 ± 0.101
0.709 ± 0.105
0.710 ± 0.102
-0.7 ± 3.3
0.719 ± 0.097
0.743 ± 0.101 *
0.756 ± 0.094 **
5.1 ± 4.2 a
0.631 ± 0.060
0.633 ± 0.053
0.632 ± 0.055
-0.1 ± 4.1
0.653 ± 0.121
0.658 ± 0.129
0.670 ± 0.129 **
2.5 ± 3.2 b
pQCT (mg/cm3) Distal radius
138.6 ± 29.3
135.3 ± 31.5
137.3 ± 31.9
-0.6 ± 6.4
126.8 ± 46.4
130.4 ± 44.3 *
130.8 ± 44.5 *
0.9 ± 5.1
424.5 ± 73.0
421.0 ± 75.6
429.9 ± 82.3
0.1 ± 3.2
388.1 ± 79.4
383.4 ± 79.6
385.4 ± 91.0
0.2 ± 3.8
1124.2 ± 172.9
1070.7 ± 289.3
1113.0 ± 178.4 **
-1.4 ± 2.2
1084.3 ± 202.8
1024.7 ± 329.8
1077.6 ± 203.3
0.1 ± 2.4 b
Bone turnover biochemical markers
Bone formation and resorption markers. Bone Alkaline Phosphate (BALP) and Deoxypyridinoline (DPD) level in patients with established osteoporosis compared between Alendronate group (ALN) (n = 22) and placebo control group (CON) (n = 25) at baseline and follow-up at 6- and 12 months (Data: mean ± SD)
62.27 ± 16.86
40.33 ± 9.98 **
34.35 ± 9.87 **
-39.9 ± 33.6a
66.17 ± 14.91
56.72 ± 18.24 **
55.13 ± 15.76 **
-16.7 ± 14.5
50.82 ± 35.10
25.11 ± 18.65 **
23.03 ± 14.72 **
-42.6 ± 30.4b
33.70 ± 20.28
40.11 ± 36.92
27.28 ± 10.95
-9.4 ± 26.7
Dropout and fracture cases
There are 13.6% (3 out of 22 subjects) and 4% (1 out of 25 subjects) patients dropped out in Alendronate and control group during 12 months intervention, respectively. The main reasons of dropout are due to loss contact in follow up measurement. None of them dropped out due to uncomfortable feeling of stomach development after Alendronate treatment. Only one ankle fracture is recorded in control group during 12-month intervention as a result of fall.
This study was designed to evaluate 12-month Alendronate treatment effects on BMD in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, i.e. patients with both low-energy Colles' fracture and BMD values below -2SD of DXA T-score measured either at spine or at hip and with. The use of -2SD of DXA T-score as intervention thresholds for drug treatment was chosen based on treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness recommended in the past [5, 11, 14, 15].
The major findings of the present study were that firstly 40% of postmenopausal women were found with DXA T-score lower that -2SD at either lumbar spine or femoral neck; and secondly there was 0.1%–5.1% overall increase in BMD at both axial and appendicular skeletons after 12-montts Alendronate treatment. The Alendronate treatment effect was revealed greater in weight bearing bones (5.1% at lumbar spine and 2.5% at femoral neck) that non-weight bearing non-dominant distal radius (0.9% in tBMD, 0.2% in iBMD, and 0.1% in cBMD). This finding was consistent with that of other studies using either Alendronate or estrogen treatments in both Caucasian [16, 17] and Chinese population [8, 9]. When comparison was made for non-weigh bearing distal radius, there was only very mild increase in trabecular BMD at distal radius in Alendronate group as compared with placebo-control group. This might suggest that Alendronate was not effective to increase BMD at the non-weight bearing skeletons.
Alendronate is a known strong inhibitor of bone resorption mainly by inducing apoptosis and impairing the function of osteoclasts as well as by preventing the apoptosis of osteocyte and osteoblast [18, 19]. Alendronate was reported to suppress the high bone turnover and increase BMD in osteoporosis patients in various ethic populations [8, 20, 21]. In the present study, we also showed the same underling mechanism of Alendronate in prevention of bone loss and/or increase of BMD in postmenopausal Chinese women with established osteoporosis. BALP and DPD were used as a couple of bone turnover biochemical markers and its turnover was suppressed significantly in Alendronate group, slightly more in bone-resorbing marker DPD as compared bone forming marker BALP at the first 6 months and continued over the 12 months intervention. This result was also similar to previous reports for the same reference population [8, 9] or other ethnic groups [13, 20, 21].
Interestingly, the present study also showed that calcium supplement alone in placebo control was also able to retard bone loss at both axial and appendicualr skeletons in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis as compared with significant bone loss in postmenopausal women of the same reference populations without any treatments reported previously [12, 22]. On the other hand, the calcium placebo effects in the present study were found comparably higher than the reported one in Caucasians [13, 20, 21]. This might be associated with the fact that the average calcium intake of Chinese women in Hong Kong (less than 800 mg/day) was notably lower than that of Caucasian women (around 1300 mg/day) [8, 9, 20].
To identify patients with established osteoporosis for prevention is clinically important as the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures increase with advancing age, in general with a sequence of Colles' fracture, vertebral fracture, and hip fractures. Logistically, to identify osteoporotic patients with low-energy Colles' fracture should be therefore more relevant for early interventions for prevention of subsequent osteoporotic fractures as spine and hip [1, 2, 4, 14, 23, 24]. The current study only recorded one ankle fracture in the control group. Such intervention study with duration of 12-months was rather short and therefore, we did not use prevention as the end-point in evaluation of treatment effects. At present, it was still uncertain how long the patient should remain on drug therapy for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of osteoporotic fractures. However, short- or mid-term drug intervention for 1–2 years might be effective for not only improving BMD but also preventing current and late fractures as there was no any acceleration in bone loss after discontinuing the drug treatment found by others [21, 23, 25, 26].
In the present study, the treatment tolerability for the anti-osteoporotic drugs was reflected partially by the dropout rate. We recorded 13.6% and 4% dropouts in Alendronate and control group during 12 months intervention, respectively. However, none of them dropped out due to discomfort of stomach after Alendronate treatment. This data was similar to the Alendronate studies on prevention of osteoporosis in the same reference population [8, 9]. In summery, this 12-months intervention study demonstrated the treatment effect of Alendronate on osteoporosis at both axial and appendicualr skeletons in Chinese postmenopausal women with low-energy Colles' fracture, with more effect on the weight-bearing spine and hip than the non-weigh bearing distal radius. Such effects were explained by significant suppression in bone turnover evaluated biochemically.
This study was supported with a Health Services Research Committee/Health Care & Promotion Fund, Hong Kong SAR, China (Ref. HSRC/HCPF: 298104). Clinical Research Ethics approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Ref. No. CRE-660). Miss WY Hung provided assistance in bone mineral density measurement.
- Hung LK, Wu HT, Leung PC, Qin L: Low BMD is a risk factor for 'low energy' Colles' fracture in pre- and postmenopausal women in Hong Kong Chinese – A DXA and pQCT study. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2005, 435: 219-25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cummings SR, Melton LJ: Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002, 359 (9319): 1761-7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lau EM, Lee JK, Suriwongpaisal P, Saw SM, Das De S, Khir A: The incidence of hip fracture in four Asian countries: the Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS). Osteoporos Int. 2001, 12 (3): 239-43. 10.1007/s001980170135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melton LJ, Thamer M, Ray NF, Chan JK, Chesnut CH, Einhorn TA, Johnston CC, Raisz LG, Silverman SL, Siris ES: Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997, 12 (1): 16-23. 10.1359/jbmr.19184.108.40.206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anonymous: Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Executivesummary. Osteoporos Int. 1998, 8 (4): S3-6.Google Scholar
- Brown JP, Josse RG: Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada: Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ. 2002, 167 (10): S1-34.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christensen PM, Brixen K, Gyrd-Hansen D, Kristiansen IS: Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Danish women. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005, 96 (5): 387-96. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_08.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kung AWC, Yeung SS, Chu LW: The efficacy and tolerability of alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporotic Chinese women: A randomized placebo-controlled study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000, 67: 286-90. 10.1007/s002230001142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lau EM, Woo J, Chan YH, Griffith J: Alendronate prevents bone loss in Chinese women with osteoporosis. Bone. 2000, 27 (5): 677-80. 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00378-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morrison LS, Tobias JH: Effect of a case-finding strategy for osteoporosis on bisphosphonate prescribing in primary care. Osteoporosis Int. 2005, 16 (1): 71-7. 10.1007/s00198-004-1644-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B: Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone. 2005, 36 (1): 22-32. 10.1016/j.bone.2004.08.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qin L, Au SK, Leung PC, Lau MC, Woo J, Choy WY, Hung WY, Dambacher MA, Leung KS: Baseline BMD and bone loss at distal radius measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in peri- andpostmenopausal Hong Kong Chinese women. Osteoporos Int. 2002, 13: 962-970. 10.1007/s001980200134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenspan SL, Parker RA, Ferguson L, Rosen HN, Maitland-Ramsey L, Karpf DB: Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict the long-term response to alendronate therapy in representative elderly women: a randomized clinical trail. J Bone Miner Res. 1998, 13: 1431-8. 10.1359/jbmr.19220.127.116.111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanis JA, Brazier JE, Stevenson M, Calvert NW, Lloyd Jones M: Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Asse. 2002, 6 (29): 1-146.Google Scholar
- WHO: Guidelines for preclinical evaluation and clinical trials in osteoporosis. 1998, WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Bouxsein ML, Parker RA, Greenspan SL: Forearm bone mineral densitometry cannot be used to monitor response to alendronate therapy in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 1999, 10: 505-9. 10.1007/s001980050261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kohrt WM, Birge SJ: Differential effects of estrogen treatment on bone mineral density of the spine, hip, wrist and total body in late postmenopausal women. Osteoporo Int. 1995, 5 (3): 150-5. 10.1007/BF02106093.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plotkin LI, Weinstein RS, Parfitt AM, Roberson PK, Manolagas SC, Bellido T: Prevention of osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis by bisphosphonates and calcitonin. J Clin Invest. 1999, 104 (10): 1363-74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stepan JJ, Alendeld F, Boivin G, Feyen JH, Lakatos P: Mechanisms of action of antiresorptive therapies of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Regul. 2003, 37 (4): 225-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Downs RW, Bell NH, Ettinger MP, Walsh BW, Favus MJ, Mako B, Wang L, Smith ME, Gormely GJ, Melton ME: Comparison of Alendronate and Intranasal Calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 85 (5): 1783-8. 10.1210/jc.85.5.1783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris ST, Gertz BJ, Genant HK, Eyre DR, Survill TT, Ventura JN, DeBrock J, Ricerca E, Chesnut CH: The effect of short term treatment with alendronate on vertebral density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in early postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993, 76 (6): 1399-406. 10.1210/jc.76.6.1399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chan K, Qin L, Lau M, Woo J, Au S, Choy W, Lee K, Lee S: A randomized, prospective study of the effects of Tai Chi Chun exercise on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Arch Phys MedRehab. 2004, 85: 717-22. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.091.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Musliner T, Hochberg MC, Nevitt MC, Suryawanshi S, Cummings SR: Fracture riskreduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the FractureIntervention Trail. FIT research group. J Clin EndocrinolMetab. 2000, 85 (11): 4118-24. 10.1210/jc.85.11.4118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riis BJ, Hansen MA, Jensen AM, Overgaard K, Christiansen C: Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15-year follow-up study. Bone. 1996, 19 (1): 9-12. 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00102-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ: Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: Results from the fracture intervention trial. JAMA. 1998, 280 (24): 2077-82. 10.1001/jama.280.24.2077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pols HA, Felsenberg D, Hanley DA, Stepan J, Munoz-Torres M, Wilkin TJ, Qin-Sheng G, Galich AM, Vandormael K, Yates AJ, Stych B: Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results of the FOSIT study. Fosamax International Trial Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999, 9 (5): 461-8. 10.1007/PL00004171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.